ArticleConditioning medicine2019
Is there a role for remote ischemic conditioning in preventing 5-fluorouracil-induced coronary vasospasm?
Article in Conditioning medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progress on the regulation of colorectal cancer and cardio-oncology by the gut microbiota and nutrients.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes With 5-Fluorouracil-Associated Coronary Vasospasm.JACC. CardioOncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac ischemia associated with chemotherapy has been linked to several anti-neoplastic agents and is multifactorial in etiology. Coronary artery vasospasm is one of the most commonly reported effects of cancer therapy that can lead to myocardial ischemia or infarction. The chemotherapy agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or its oral pro-drug capecitabine can result in coronary vascular endothelial dysfunction causing coronary artery spasm, and possibly coronary thrombosis. These drugs have also been shown to be associated with myocardial infarction, malignant ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and sudden death. The proposed mechanisms underlying cardiotoxicity induced by 5-FU are vascular endothelial damage followed by thrombus formation, ischemia secondary to coronary artery vasospasm, direct toxicity on myocardium, and thrombogenicity. There remains a pressing need to discover novel and effective therapies that can prevent or ameliorate 5-FU associated cardiotoxicity. To this point, promising overlap has been observed between proposed remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) cardioprotective mechanisms and 5FU-associated cardiotoxic cellular pathways. RIC, in which transient episodes of limb ischemia and reperfusion (induced by inflations and deflations of a pneumatic cuff placed on the upper arm or thigh), confer both cardioprotective and vasculoprotective effects, and may therefore prevent 5-FU coronary artery spasm/cardiotoxicity. In this review, we will be discussing the following potentially therapeutic aspects of RIC in ameliorating 5-FU associated cardiotoxicity: sequential phases of 5-FU cardiotoxicity as possible targets for dual windows of cardioprotection characteristic of RIC; protective effects of RIC on endothelial function and microvasculature in relation to 5-FU induced endothelial dysfunction/microvascular dysfunction; reduction in platelet activation by RIC in the context of 5-FU induced thrombogenicity; and the utility of improvement in mitochondrial function conferred by RIC in 5-FU induced cellular toxicity secondary to mitochondrial dysfunction.
Identifiers
32133437PMC7055861W3011844803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.