ArticleNanoImpact2019
Dispersion preparation, characterization, and dosimetric analysis of cellulose nano-fibrils and nano-crystals: Implications for cellular toxicological studies.
Article in NanoImpact, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Toxicological Assessment of Cellulose Nanomaterials: Oral Exposure.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Effect of Surface Modification on the Pulmonary and Systemic Toxicity of Cellulose Nanofibrils.Biomacromolecules · 2022Article
- Analysis of the In Vitro Toxicity of Nanocelluloses in Human Lung Cells as Compared to Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Differential modulation of endothelial cytoplasmic protrusions after exposure to graphene-family nanomaterials.NanoImpact · 2022Article
- Surface functionalization and size modulate the formation of reactive oxygen species and genotoxic effects of cellulose nanofibrils.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2022Article
- Effects of ingested nanocellulose and nanochitosan materials on carbohydrate digestion and absorption in an in vitro small intestinal epithelium model.Environmental science. Nano · 2021Article
- Fluorescently Labeled Cellulose Nanofibers for Environmental Health and Safety Studies.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Role of Surface Chemistry in the In Vitro Lung Response to Nanofibrillated Cellulose.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Engineering Two-dimensional Nanomaterials to Enable Structure-Activity Relationship Studies in Nanosafety Research.NanoImpact · 2020Article
- Physicochemical and Morphological Transformations of Chitosan Nanoparticles across the Gastrointestinal Tract and Cellular Toxicity in an In Vitro Model of the Small Intestinal Epithelium.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2020Article
- Prediction of protein corona on nanomaterials by machine learning using novel descriptors.NanoImpact · 2020Article
- An in vitro assay and artificial intelligence approach to determine rate constants of nanomaterial-cell interactions.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The characterization of cellulose-based nanomaterial (CNM) suspensions in environmental and biological media is impaired because of their high carbon content and anisotropic shape, thus making it difficult to derive structure activity relationships (SAR) in toxicological studies. Here, a standardized method for the dispersion preparation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) and nanocrystals (CNC) in biological and environmental media was developed. Specifically, electron microscopy was utilized and allowed to specify optimum practices for efficiently suspending CNF and CNC in water and cell culture medium. Furthermore, a technique for measuring the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.