Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32133354›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Juliana R Dias, Nilza Ribeiro, Sara Baptista-Silva, Ana Rita Costa-Pinto, Nuno Alves, Ana L Oliveira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Polyphenols in wound healing: unlocking prospects with clinical applications.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Minimally invasive bioprinting forBioactive materials · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Advanced Soft Robotic System for In Situ 3D Bioprinting and Endoscopic Surgery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  14. Bioinks adapted forRSC advances · 2023
    Review
  15. Editorial: Advances in biofabrication for skin regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  16. Commercial articulated collaborativeInternational journal of bioprinting · 2023
    Article
  17. Highlights on Advancing Frontiers in Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Development ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juliana R DiasCentre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
Nilza RibeiroCBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina, Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa1, Porto, Portugal.
Sara Baptista-SilvaCBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina, Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa1, Porto, Portugal.
Ana Rita Costa-PintoCBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina, Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa1, Porto, Portugal.
Nuno AlvesCentre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
Ana L OliveiraCBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina, Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa1, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

bioprintingcomputer/non-computer assisted approachesin situ approachesin situ biomaterialstissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID32133354
PMCPMC7039825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.