ArticleTranslational and clinical pharmacology2017
Parameter estimation for sigmoid E
Article in Translational and clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cyclodextrin nanosponges enhance the oral pharmacokinetics and antiplatelet efficacy of prasugrel hydrochloride in Wistar rats.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Checkerboard synergistic data analysis using a Hill function-based approach.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Formulation and Validation of an Extended Sigmoid Emax Model in Pharmacodynamics.Pharmaceutical research · 2024Article
- Population pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and efficacy modeling of SB12 (proposed eculizumab biosimilar) and reference eculizumab.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Article
- Impact of Sampling Period on Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Antibiotics: Why do You Take Blood Samples Following the Fourth Dose?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Control Theory and Cancer Chemotherapy: How They Interact.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this simulation study is to explore the limitation of the population PK/PD analysis using data from a clinical study and to help to construct an appropriate PK/PD design that enable precise and unbiased estimation of both fixed and random PD parameters in PK/PD analysis under different doses and Hill coefficients. Seven escalating doses of virtual drugs with equal potency and efficacy but with five different Hill coefficients were used in simulations of single and multiple dose scenarios with dense sampling design. A total of 70 scenarios with 100 subjects were simulated and estimated 100 times applying 1-compartment PK model and sigmoid E
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.