ReviewTranslational and clinical pharmacology2017
Pharmacokinetic variability due to environmental differences.
Review in Translational and clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacokinetics of solifenacin in pediatric populations with overactive bladder or neurogenic detrusor overactivity.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2020Trial
- Abacavir Drug Exposures in African Children Under 14 kg Using Pediatric Solid Fixed Dose Combinations According to World Health Organization Weight Bands.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2023Article
- Population pharmacokinetics of apramycin from first-in-human plasma and urine data to support prediction of efficacious dose.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022Article
- R-praziquantel integrated population pharmacokinetics in preschool- and school-aged African children infected with Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium and Lao adults infected with Opisthorchis viverrini.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2022Article
- Pharmacodynamic principles and target concentration intervention.Translational and clinical pharmacology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This tutorial describes sources of pharmacokinetic variability that are not obviously linked to genetic differences. The sources of variability are therefore described as environmental. The major quantitative sources of environmental variability are body size (including body composition), maturation and organ function. Size should be considered in all patients. Maturation is mainly relevant to neonates and infants less than 2 years of age. Renal function is the most important predictable source of variability due to differences in organ function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.