Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32133244›Full record

ArticleOpen journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020

Cervical Characterization with Tactile-Ultrasound Probe.

Vladimir Egorov, Todd Rosen, Heather van Raalte, Viktors Kurtenoks

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03199079 completednot on this map

Cervix Monitor for Risk Assessment of Spontaneous Preterm Delivery

TypeobservationalSponsorAdvanced Tactile Imaging, Inc.Ran2017 to 2022Enrolled20ConditionsPreterm BirthArmsMeasurement
NCT04247555 unknown statusnot on this map

Cervix Monitor for Elasticity and Length Measurements

TypeobservationalSponsorAdvanced Tactile Imaging, Inc.Ran2020 to 2022Enrolled270ConditionsPreterm Birth
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Vaginal tactile imaging: A review.Pelviperineology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vladimir EgorovAdvanced Tactile Imaging, Trenton, NJ, USA.
Todd RosenDepartment of Obstetrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Heather van RaaltePrinceton Urogynecology, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Viktors KurtenoksAdvanced Tactile Imaging, Trenton, NJ, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Cervix monitor for risk assessment of spontaneous preterm deliveryR44HD090793 · NICHD · ADVANCED TACTILE IMAGING, INC. · PI Vladimir Egorov · 2019 to 2026
$4.1M
Cervix monitor for risk assessment of spontaneous preterm deliveryR43HD090793 · NICHD · ADVANCED TACTILE IMAGING, INC. · PI EGOROV, VLADIMIR · 2016 to 2016
$225k
NICHD NIH HHS R43 HD090793NICHD NIH HHS R44 HD090793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPremature cervical softening and shortening may be considered an early mechanical failure that predisposes to preterm birth. Preliminary clinical studies demonstrate that cervical elastography may be able to quantify this phenomenon and predict spontaneous preterm delivery.

objectiveTo explore a new approach for cervix elasticity and length measurements with tactile-ultrasound probe.

methodsCervix probe has tactile array and ultrasound transducer designed to apply controllable load to cervix and acquire stress-strain data for calculation of cervical elasticity (Young's modulus) and cervical length for four cervix sectors. Average values, standard deviations, intraclass correlation coefficients and the 95% limits of agreement (Bland-Altman plots) were estimated.

resultsTen non-pregnant and ten pregnant women were examined with the probe. The study with non-pregnant women demonstrated a reliable acquisition of the tactile signals. The ultrasound signals had a prolonged appearance; identification of the internal os of the cervix in these signals was not reliable. The study with pregnant women with the gestational age of 25.4 ± 2.3 weeks demonstrated reliable data acquisition with real-time visualization of the ultrasound signals. Average values for cervical elasticity and standard deviations of 19.7 ± 15.4 kPa and length of 30.7 ± 6.6 mm were calculated based on two measurements per 4 sectors. Measurement repeatability calculated as intraclass correlation coefficients between two measurements at the same cervix sector on pregnant women was found to be 0.97 for cervical elasticity and 0.93 for the cervical length. The 95% limits of agreement of 1) cervical elasticity were from -22.4% to +14.9%, and 2) cervical length from -13.3% to +16.5%.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated clinically acceptable measurement performance and reproducibility. The availability of stress-strain data allowed the computation of cervical elasticity and length. This approach has the potential to provide cervical markers to predict spontaneous preterm delivery.

Indexed as

Cervical ElasticityCervical LengthElastographyPremature Cervical SofteningSpontaneous Preterm DeliveryTactileUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID32133244
PMCPMC7055710
OpenAlexW2999677002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.