ArticleBiomedical optics express2020
TGV-regularized inversion of the Radon transform for photoacoustic tomography.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose and study a reconstruction method for photoacoustic tomography (PAT) based on total generalized variation (TGV) regularization for the inversion of the slice-wise 2D-Radon transform in 3D. The latter problem occurs for recently-developed PAT imaging techniques with parallelized integrating ultrasound detection where projection data from various directions is sequentially acquired. As the imaging speed is presently limited to 20 seconds per 3D image, the reconstruction of temporally-resolved 3D sequences of, e.g., one heartbeat or breathing cycle, is very challenging and currently, the presence of motion artifacts in the reconstructions obstructs the applicability for biomedical research. In order to push these techniques forward towards real time, it thus becomes necessary to reconstruct from less measured data such as few-projection data and consequently, to employ sophisticated reconstruction methods in order to avoid typical artifacts. The proposed TGV-regularized Radon inversion is a variational method that is shown to be capable of such artifact-free inversion. It is validated by numerical simulations, compared to filtered back projection (FBP), and performance-tested on real data from phantom as well as in-vivo mouse experiments. The results indicate that a speed-up factor of four is possible without compromising reconstruction quality.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.