Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32132946›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

A Bayesian Approach to the Analysis of Local Average Treatment Effect for Missing and Non-normal Data in Causal Modeling: A Tutorial With the ALMOND Package in R.

Dingjing Shi, Xin Tong, M Joseph Meyer

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dingjing ShiDepartment of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Xin TongDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
M Joseph MeyerDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
University of Virginia · USUniversity of Oklahoma · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One practical challenge in observational studies and quasi-experimental designs is selection bias. The issue of selection bias becomes more concerning when data are non-normal and contain missing values. Recently, a Bayesian robust two-stage causal modeling with instrumental variables was developed and has the advantages of addressing selection bias and handle non-normal data and missing data simultaneously in one model. The method provides reliable parameter and standard error estimates when missing data and outliers exist. The modeling technique can be widely applied to empirical studies particularly in social, psychological and behavioral areas where any of the three issues (e.g., selection bias, data with outliers and missing data) is commonly seen. To implement this method, we developed an R package named ALMOND (

Indexed as

bayesian methodcausal modelinginstrumental variables (IV)local average treatment effectmissing datarobust methodR packageselection bias

Identifiers

PMID32132946
PMCPMC7040373
OpenAlexW3007968965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.