Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32132752›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2020

Measuring antibiotic availability and use in 20 low- and middle-income countries.

Rebecca Knowles, Mike Sharland, Yingfen Hsia, Nicola Magrini, Lorenzo Moja, Amani Siyam, Elizabeth Tayler

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Widespread loss-of-function mutations implicating preexisting resistance to new or repurposed anti-tuberculosis drugs.Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca KnowlesNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, England.
Mike SharlandPaediatric Infectious Disease Research Group, St George's University London, London, England.
Yingfen HsiaPaediatric Infectious Disease Research Group, St George's University London, London, England.
Nicola MagriniDepartment of Essential Medicines and Health Products, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lorenzo MojaDepartment of Essential Medicines and Health Products, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Amani SiyamData Analytics and Delivery for Impact Division, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Elizabeth TaylerGlobal Coordination and Partnerships Group, Antimicrobial Resistance Division, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva 27, 1211, Switzerland.
World Health Organization · CHUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess antibiotic availability and use in health facilities in low- and middle-income countries, using the service provision assessment and service availability and readiness assessment surveys.

methodsWe obtained data on antibiotic availability at 13 561 health facilities in 13 service provision assessment and 8 service availability and readiness assessment surveys. In 10 service provision assessment surveys, child consultations with health-care providers were observed, giving data on antibiotic use in 22 699 children. Antibiotics were classified as access, watch or reserve, according to the World Health Organization's AWaRe categories. The percentage of health-care facilities across countries with specific antibiotics available and the proportion of children receiving antibiotics for key clinical syndromes were estimated.

findingsThe surveys assessed the availability of 27 antibiotics (19 access, 7 watch, 1 unclassified). Co-trimoxazole and metronidazole were most widely available, being in stock at 89.5% (interquartile range, IQR: 11.6%) and 87.1% (IQR: 15.9%) of health facilities, respectively. In contrast, 17 other access and watch antibiotics were stocked, by fewer than a median of 50% of facilities. Of the 22 699 children observed, 60.1% (13 638) were prescribed antibiotics (mostly co-trimoxazole or amoxicillin). Children with respiratory conditions were most often prescribed antibiotics (76.1%; 8972/11 796) followed by undifferentiated fever (50.1%; 760/1518), diarrhoea (45.7%; 1293/2832) and malaria (30.3%; 352/1160).

conclusionRoutine health facility surveys provided a valuable data source on the availability and use of antibiotics in low- and middle-income countries. Many access antibiotics were unavailable in a majority of most health-care facilities.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsChildChild, PreschoolDeveloping CountriesHealth FacilitiesHealth ServicesHumansInfantWorld Health OrganizationAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID32132752
PMCPMC7047034
OpenAlexW3008480297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.