Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32132652›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord2020

Fully automatic 3D segmentation of the thoracolumbar spinal cord and the vertebral canal from T2-weighted MRI using K-means clustering algorithm.

Sahar Sabaghian, Hamed Dehghani, Seyed Amir Hossein Batouli, Ali Khatibi, Mohammad Ali Oghabian

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. 3D U-net for volumetric segmentation of spinal cord MRI in degenerative disorders.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Spine Medical Image Segmentation Based on Deep Learning.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sahar SabaghianDepartment of Software, School of Computer Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Hamed DehghaniNeuro Imaging and Analysis Group (NIAG), Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging (RCMCI), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Amir Hossein BatouliNeuro Imaging and Analysis Group (NIAG), Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging (RCMCI), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali KhatibiCentre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0679-0499
Mohammad Ali OghabianNeuro Imaging and Analysis Group (NIAG), Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging (RCMCI), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. oghabian@sina.tums.ac.ir.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRIran University of Science and Technology · IRUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designMethod development.

objectivesTo develop a reliable protocol for automatic segmentation of Thoracolumbar spinal cord using MRI based on K-means clustering algorithm in 3D images.

settingUniversity-based laboratory, Tehran, Iran.

methodsT2 structural volumes acquired from the spinal cord of 20 uninjured volunteers on a 3T MR scanner. We proposed an automatic method for spinal cord segmentation based on the K-means clustering algorithm in 3D images and compare our results with two available segmentation methods (PropSeg, DeepSeg) implemented in the Spinal Cord Toolbox. Dice and Hausdorff were used to compare the results of our method (K-Seg) with the manual segmentation, PropSeg, and DeepSeg.

resultsThe accuracy of our automatic segmentation method for T2-weighted images was significantly better or similar to the SCT methods, in terms of 3D DC (p < 0.001). The 3D DCs were respectively (0.81 ± 0.04) and Hausdorff Distance (12.3 ± 2.48) by the K-Seg method in contrary to other SCT methods for T2-weighted images.

conclusionsThe output with similar protocols showed that K-Seg results match the manual segmentation better than the other methods especially on the thoracolumbar levels in the spinal cord due to the low image contrast as a result of poor SNR in these areas.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdultFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingSpinal CanalSpinal CordThoracic Vertebrae

Identifiers

PMID32132652
OpenAlexW3010120753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.