Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32131964›Full record

Trial reportHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2020

Preoperative behavioural intervention to reduce drinking before elective orthopaedic surgery: the PRE-OP BIRDS feasibility RCT.

Christopher Snowden, Ellen Lynch, Leah Avery, Catherine Haighton, Denise Howel, Valentina Mamasoula, Eilish Gilvarry, Elaine McColl, James Prentis, Craig Gerrand and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher SnowdenThe Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ellen LynchInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Leah AverySchool of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Catherine HaightonDepartment of Social Work, Education & Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Denise HowelInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Valentina MamasoulaInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Eilish GilvarryNewcastle Addictions Service, Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Elaine McCollInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
James PrentisThe Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Craig GerrandRoyal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Alison SteelNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Nicola GoudieNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Nicola HoweNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Eileen KanerInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle University · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBCumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust · GBNorthumbria University · GBRoyal National Orthopaedic Hospital · GBTeesside University · GB

Funding

Department of Health HTA/14/42/01Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeavy alcohol consumption is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications and extended hospital stay. Alcohol consumption therefore represents a modifiable risk factor for surgical outcomes. Brief behavioural interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing alcohol consumption among increased risk and risky drinkers in other health-care settings and may offer a method of addressing preoperative alcohol consumption.

objectivesTo investigate the feasibility of introducing a screening process to assess adult preoperative drinking levels and to deliver a brief behavioural intervention adapted for the target population group. To conduct a two-arm (brief behavioural intervention plus standard preoperative care vs. standard preoperative care alone), multicentre, pilot randomised controlled trial to assess the feasibility of proceeding to a definitive trial. To conduct focus groups and a national web-based survey to establish current treatment as usual for alcohol screening and intervention in preoperative assessment.

designA single-centre, qualitative, feasibility study was followed by a multicentre, two-arm (brief behavioural intervention vs. treatment as usual), individually randomised controlled pilot trial with an embedded qualitative process evaluation. Focus groups and a quantitative survey were employed to characterise treatment as usual in preoperative assessment.

settingThe feasibility study took place at a secondary care hospital in the north-east of England. The pilot trial was conducted at three large secondary care centres in the north-east of England.

participantsNine health-care professionals and 15 patients (mean age 70.5 years, 86.7% male) participated in the feasibility study. Eleven health-care professionals and 68 patients (mean age 66.2 years, 80.9% male) participated in the pilot randomised trial. An additional 19 health-care professionals were recruited to one of three focus groups, while 62 completed an electronic survey to characterise treatment as usual.

interventionsThe brief behavioural intervention comprised two sessions. The first session, delivered face to face in the preoperative assessment clinic, involved 5 minutes of structured brief advice followed by 15-20 minutes of behaviour change counselling, including goal-setting, problem-solving and identifying sources of social support. The second session, an optional booster, took place approximately 1 week before surgery and offered the opportunity to assess progress and boost self-efficacy.

main outcome measuresFeasibility was assessed using rates of eligibility, recruitment and retention. The progression criteria for a definitive trial were recruitment of ≥ 40% of eligible patients and retention of ≥ 70% at 6-month follow-up. Acceptability was assessed using themes identified in qualitative data.

resultsThe initial recruitment of eligible patients was low but improved with the optimisation of recruitment processes. The recruitment of eligible participants to the pilot trial (34%) fell short of the progression criteria but was mitigated by very high retention (96%) at the 6-month follow-up. Multimethod analyses identified the methods as acceptable to the patients and professionals involved and offers recommendations of ways to further improve recruitment.

conclusionsThe evidence supports the feasibility of a definitive trial to assess the effectiveness of brief behavioural intervention in reducing preoperative alcohol consumption and for secondary outcomes of surgical complications if recommendations for further improvements are adopted.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN36257982.

fundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyCounselingOrthopedic ProceduresPreoperative CareAgedAlcohol DrinkingEnglandFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalALCOHOL DRINKINGENGLANDFEASIBILITY STUDIESPILOT PROJECTSPOSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONSPREOPERATIVE PERIODTREATMENT OUTCOME

Identifiers

PMID32131964
PMCPMC7086307
OpenAlexW3009166156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.