Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32131925›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2021

Use of concurrent evaluation to improve implementation of a home fortification programme in Bangladesh: a methodological innovation.

Haribondhu Sarma, Md Fakhar Uddin, Mohammad Ashraful Islam, Mahfuzur Rahman, Grant J Aaron, Catherine Harbour, Cathy Banwell, Tahmeed Ahmed

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haribondhu SarmaNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Mohakhali, Dhaka1212, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-1553-8498
Md Fakhar UddinNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Mohakhali, Dhaka1212, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Ashraful IslamNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Mohakhali, Dhaka1212, Bangladesh.
Mahfuzur RahmanNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Mohakhali, Dhaka1212, Bangladesh.
Grant J AaronGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Geneva, Switzerland.
Catherine HarbourEvidence, Measurement and Evaluation, The Children's Investment Fund Foundation, London, UK.
Cathy BanwellResearch School of Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Tahmeed AhmedNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Mohakhali, Dhaka1212, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis paper focuses on the use of 'concurrent evaluation' to evaluate a nationally scaled-up programme in Bangladesh that was implemented by BRAC (an international development organisation) using Shasthya Shebika (SS) - volunteer community health workers - to promote home fortification with micronutrient powders (MNP) for children under-five.

designWe developed a programme impact pathway to conceptualise the implementation and evaluation strategy and developed a strategic partnership among the key programme stakeholders for better use of evaluation evidence. We developed a multi-method concurrent evaluation strategy to provide insights into the BRAC programme and created provision for course correction to the implementation plan while it was in operation.

settingOne hundred sixty-four sub-districts and six urban slums in Bangladesh.

participantsCaregivers of children 6-59 months, SS and BRAC's staff members.

resultsThe evaluation identified low awareness about home fortification among caregivers, inadequate supply and frequent MNP stockouts, and inadequate skills of BRAC's SS to promote MNP at the community level as hindrances to the achievement of programme goals. The partners regularly discussed evaluation results during and after implementation activities to assess progress in programme coverage and any needs for modification. BRAC initiated a series of corrections to the original implementation plan to address these challenges, which improved the design of the MNP programme; this resulted in enhanced programme outcomes.

conclusionsConcurrent evaluation is an innovative approach to evaluate complex real-world programmes. Here it was utilised in implementing a large-scale nutrition programme to measure implementation process and effectiveness.

Indexed as

MicronutrientsTrace ElementsBangladeshChildCommunity Health WorkersHumansNutritional StatusMicronutrientsTrace ElementsBangladeshConcurrent evaluationHome fortificationImplementation scienceMixed method

Identifiers

PMID32131925
PMCPMC8042578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.