Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32131890›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2020

Insensitivity versus poor response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study.

Sae Ochi, Kazuyoshi Saito, Fumitaka Mizoguchi, Shigeaki Kato, Yoshiya Tanaka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Late Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis.Aging and disease · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sae OchiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-shinbashi 3-25-8, Minatoku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan. ochisae1024@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4133-3170
Kazuyoshi SaitoFirst Department, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Iseigaoka 1-1, Yawatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 80708556, Japan.
Fumitaka MizoguchiDepartment of Rheumatology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan.
Shigeaki KatoCenter for Regional Cooperation, Iwaki Meisei University, Chuodai Iino 5-5-1, Iwaki, Fukushima, 970-8551, Japan.
Yoshiya TanakaFirst Department, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Iseigaoka 1-1, Yawatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 80708556, Japan.
University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan · JPIRYO Sosei University · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith advancement in the treatment options of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), optimising the outcomes of difficult-to-treat patients has become increasingly important in clinical practice. In particular, insensitivity to first-line biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD) is becoming a significant problem because it may decrease the treatment adherence of patients. This study aimed to compare RA patients with an insensitivity and those with a poor response to initial treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis), which are the most frequently used bDMARDs.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study using clinical data from the FIRST registry. bDMARD-naïve RA patients treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) from August 2003 to May 2019 were included and categorised into three groups: TNFi insensitivity, poor response to TNFis and controls. TNFi insensitivity was defined as follows: (1) discontinuation of TNFi treatment within 22 weeks due to lack of any response, or (2) an increase in the disease activity score in 28 joints-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) of > 0.6 at week 22 compared with week 0. Among the remaining patients, those with a DAS28-CRP > 2.6 at week 22 were categorised in the poor response group.

resultsOf the included patients, 94 were classified in the insensitivity, 604 in the poor response and 915 in the control. A higher DAS28-CRP before treatment was a risk factor for a poor response but not for insensitivity. In contrast, dose escalation of infliximab decreased the risk of a poor response but not that of insensitivity.

conclusionsIn future research, poor and insensitivity to bDMARDs should be assessed separately to fully elucidate the aetiology of, and risk factors for, bDMARD refractoriness.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidCohort StudiesDrug ResistanceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAntirheumatic AgentsTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsInsensitivityRheumatoid arthritisTumour necrosis factor inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32131890
PMCPMC7057565
OpenAlexW3011801068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.