Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32131856›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2020

Berries, greens, and medicinal herbs-mapping and assessing wild plants as an ecosystem service in Transylvania (Romania).

Ágnes Vári, Ildikó Arany, Ágnes Kalóczkai, Katalin Kelemen, Judith Papp, Bálint Czúcz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ágnes VáriMTA Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót, Hungary. vari.agnes@okologia.mta.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5285-847X
Ildikó AranyMTA Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót, Hungary.
Ágnes KalóczkaiMTA Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót, Hungary.
Katalin KelemenMilvus Group Association, Crinului Str. 22, 540343, Târgu Mureş, Romania.
Judith PappMilvus Group Association, Crinului Str. 22, 540343, Târgu Mureş, Romania.
Bálint CzúczMTA Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót, Hungary.

Funding

EEA Grants 3458/19.05.2015GINOP 2.3.3-15-2016-00019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWild edible plants as well as medicinal herbs are still widely used natural resources in Eastern Europe that are frequently accessed by the local population. Ethnobotanical studies rarely give insight to the specific ecosystems in which wild food and medicinal plants grow in a spatially explicit way. The present work assesses the potential of different ecosystems to provide wild plants for food and medicinal use based on 37 selected plant species, gives an estimate on the actual use of wild plants, and allows insights into the motivation of local people to collect wild plants.

methodsA number of interdisciplinary methods were used: participatory stakeholder workshops with experts scoring the provisioning capacity of ecosystem types, GIS for representing results (capacity maps), basic data statistics for actual use assessment, and interviews for analysing motivations.

resultsCapacity to provide wild edible plants was assessed highest in broad-leaved forests and wetlands, while for medicinal herbs, orchards were rated best. We could find a multitude of motivations for gathering that could be grouped along four main lines corresponding to major dimensions of well-being (health, habit/tradition, nutrition/income, pleasure/emotional), with health reasons dominating very clearly the range (59% of answers), which can be interpreted as a combination of modern "green" values with a traditional lifestyle. We detected some distinct patterns of motivations between the different social groups analysed with more fundamental needs associated with lower level socio-ecological background.

conclusionThis case study provides an example on the importance of wild plants for locals from several points of view. We emphasize the relevance of these local stakeholder views to be included in decision-making and ecosystem management, which can be achieved by the presented workflow for mapping and assessment of ecosystem services which is also compatible with EU-suggested Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES).

Indexed as

EthnobotanyMotivationConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemFemaleHumansKnowledgeMalePlants, EdiblePlants, MedicinalRomaniaHuman well-beingMappingMotivationsNon-timber forest productsSpreadsheet approachWild edible plantsWild food plants

Identifiers

PMID32131856
PMCPMC7057653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.