Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32131835›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2020

The equine gastrointestinal microbiome: impacts of weight-loss.

Philippa K Morrison, Charles J Newbold, Eleanor Jones, Hilary J Worgan, Dai H Grove-White, Alexandra H Dugdale, Clare Barfoot, Patricia A Harris, Caroline McGregor Argo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Philippa K MorrisonScotland's Rural College, Craibstone Estate, Aberdeen, UK. philippa.morrison@sruc.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4187-0371
Charles J NewboldScotland's Rural College, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, UK.
Eleanor JonesAberystwyth University, Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK.
Hilary J WorganAberystwyth University, Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK.
Dai H Grove-WhiteUniversity of Liverpool, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston, Wirral, UK.
Alexandra H DugdaleChesterGates Veterinary Specialists CVS (UK) Ltd., Chester, UK.
Clare BarfootMARS Horsecare UK Ltd, Old Wolverton, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Patricia A HarrisWALTHAM Petcare Science Institute, Freeby lane, Waltham-on-the-Wolds, Leicestershire, UK.
Caroline McGregor ArgoScotland's Rural College, Craibstone Estate, Aberdeen, UK.
Scotland's Rural College · GBAberystwyth University · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Waltham Centre for Pet Nutrition N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity is an important equine welfare issue. Whilst dietary restriction is the most effective weight-loss tool, individual animals range in their weight-loss propensity. Gastrointestinal-derived bacteria play a fundamental role in host-health and have been associated with obesity and weight-loss in other species. This study evaluated the faecal microbiome (next-generation sequencing of 16S rRNA genes) of 15 obese Welsh Mountain pony mares, in the same 11-week period across 2 years (n = 8 Year 1; n = 7 Year 2). Following a 4-week acclimation period (pre-diet phase) during which time individuals were fed the same hay to maintenance (2% body mass (BM) as daily dry matter (DM) intake), animals underwent a 7-week period of dietary restriction (1% BM hay as daily DM intake). Faeces were sampled on the final 3 days of the pre-diet phase and the final 3 days of the dietary restriction phase. Bacterial communities were determined using Next Generation Sequencing of amplified V1-V2 hypervariable regions of bacterial 16S rRNA.

resultsLosses in body mass ranged from 7.11 to 11.59%. Changes in the faecal microbiome composition following weight-loss included a reduction in the relative abundance of Firmicutes and Tenericutes and a reduction in indices of bacterial diversity. Pre-diet diversity was negatively associated with weight-loss. Pre-diet faecal acetate concentration was a strong predictor of subsequent weight-loss and negatively associated with Sphaerochaeta (Spirochaetes phylum) abundance. When animals were divided into 3 groups (high, mid, low) based overall weight loss, pre-diet bacterial community structure was found to have the greatest divergence between the high and low weight-loss groups (R = 0.67, p <  0.01), following PERMANOVA and ANOSIM analysis.

conclusionsWeight-loss in this group of ponies was associated with lower pre-diet faecal bacterial diversity and greater pre-diet acetate concentration. Overall, these data support a role for the faecal microbiome in weight-loss propensity in ponies and provide a baseline for research evaluating elements of the faecal microbiome in predicting weight-loss success in larger cohorts.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAcetatesAnimalsDietFecesFemaleHorsesObesityRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWeight LossAcetatesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SApparent digestibilityBiomarkersEquine, equine obesityFaecal microbiomeInsulin dysregulationVolatile fatty acidWeight-loss

Identifiers

PMID32131835
PMCPMC7057583
OpenAlexW3010376443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.