ArticleBMC health services research2020
Antecedents of use of e-health services in Central Eastern Europe: a qualitative comparative analysis.
Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guidance to develop a multidisciplinary, international, pediatric registry: a systematic review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Digital Health Technologies Empower Family-Mediated Interventions for Autistic Children: A Scoping Review.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Digital solutions for migrant and refugee health: a framework for analysis and action.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Review
- National eHealth strategies: a comparative study of nine OECD health systems.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Synergistic pathways for health investment and economic development in China: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- A New Framework for Co-Creating Telehealth for Cancer Care with the Patient Community.The patient · 2023Article
- Technological Competency As Caring in Nursing: a Description, Analysis and Evaluation of The Theory.Zdravstveno varstvo · 2022Article
- Inequity in the Access to eHealth and Its Decomposition Case of Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Patient Readiness for Remote Healthcare Services in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From European Countries.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Profile of the Users and the Most Visited Topics of a Pediatric eHealth Website.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- E-Health Practices and Technologies: A Systematic Review from 2014 to 2019.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Facility-level conditions leading to higher reach: a configurational analysis of national VA weight management programming.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Clinical genetics in transition-a comparison of genetic services in Estonia, Finland, and the Netherlands.Journal of community genetics · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the Peer-Supported E-Health Module Implemented for University Students to Develop Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors.Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this paper is to identify the key conditions that positively affect the use of e-health services in Central Eastern Europe (CEE) countries. CEE countries after the political and economic transformation in 1989/90 implemented slightly different national health care models. The research question of the study is: how do the various institutional conditions at the national level affect the use of e-health services in CEE countries?
methodsThe e-health description was derived from papers indexed in Web of Science and Scopus. The data for computation were collected from the 2015 global survey by the WHO Global Observatory for eHealth. We used a narrative literature review in order to identify key terms associated to e-health and conditions for the implementation of e-health services. The search terms were "e-health" and "*" where * was particular thematic section of e-health according to WHO GOeH. The inclusion criterion was relevance of the paper to e-health and searched phase. Eligibility criteria for countries for being described as CEE countries: Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Slovenia, and Croatia (we omitted Slovakia from the analysis because this country was not covered by the WHO Survey). We applied qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to analyse the necessary order of conditions. The dependent variable of the study is the national rate of use of e-health services.
resultsQCA shows that legal medical jurisdiction, teleprogramme and electronic health records supplemented by adequate training constitute critical conditions to achieve success in e-health implementation.
conclusionsWe conclude that the more formalised a framework for e-health service delivery is, the more likely it will be used. Therefore formalisation fosters the diffusion, dissemination and implementation of e-health solutions in this area. Formalisation must be accompanied by tailored training for health care professionals and patients. Our analyses are related only to the paths of e-health implementation in CEE countries thus consequently the findings and conclusions cannot be directly applied to other countries. The limitations of this study are related the absence of a broader context of e-health development, including the development of ICT infrastructure and ICT literacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.