Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32131808›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

Content and system development of a digital patient-provider communication tool to support shared decision making in chronic health care: InvolveMe.

Berit Seljelid, Cecilie Varsi, Lise Solberg Nes, Aud-E Stenehjem, Jens Bollerslev, Elin Børøsund

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04218721 (Implementing eHealth Interventions Into Regular Clinical Practice to Enhance Care Planning, Communication and Patient Involvement), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04218721 nacompletednot on this map

Implementing eHealth Interventions Into Regular Clinical Practice to Enhance Care Planning, Communication and Patient Involvement

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2020 to 2020Enrolled23ConditionsRenal Transplant Recipients, Non-functioning Pituitary AdenomaArmsInvolveMe
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Berit SeljelidDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Cecilie VarsiDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Lise Solberg NesDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Aud-E StenehjemDepartment of Nephrology, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jens BollerslevInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Elin BørøsundDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. elin.borosund@rr-research.no.ORCID 0000-0003-3897-7055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic conditions present major health problems, affecting an increasing number of individuals who experience a variety of symptoms that impact their health related quality of life. Digital tools can be of support in chronic conditions, potentially improving patient-provider communication, promoting shared decision making for treatment and care, and possibly even improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to develop a digital tool for patient-provider communication in chronic health care settings and describes the data collection and subsequent content and software development of the InvolveMe tool. InvolveMe will provide patients with the opportunity to report symptoms and preferences to their health care providers (HCP), and to use secure messaging to interact with the HCPs.

methodThe study employed a combination of interviews with patients with chronic conditions and focus groups with HCPs, examining experiences with chronic conditions and the potential use of a digital tool for support. Participants were recruited from two outpatient clinics at a university hospital. Data collected from interviews and focus groups were analysed using thematic analysis. Content and software development was informed by the data collection and by tool development workshops.

resultsAnalyses from interviews with patients (n = 14) and focus groups with HCPs (n = 11) generated three main themes: 1) Making symptoms and challenges visible, 2) Mastering a new life, and 3) Digital opportunities for follow-up. Each main theme generated separate subthemes. Theme 1 and 2 gave input for content development of the symptom and needs assessment part of the tool, while theme 3 provided ideas for the software development of the InvolveMe tool. Tool development workshops with patients (n = 6) and HCPs (n = 6) supplemented the development.

conclusionsA digital tool such as InvolveMe has the potential to support shared decision making for patients with chronic health conditions. Through integration with an existing patient portal such a tool can provide opportunities for meaningful interactions and communication between patients and HCP's, particularly with regards to symptoms, needs and preferences for care.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedDisease ManagementSoftware DesignAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationTelemedicineDigital assessmentDigital communicationeHealthNon-functioning pituitary adenomaPatient centered carePatient-provider communicationPatient-provider interactionRenal transplant recipientsSecure messagingShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID32131808
PMCPMC7057594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.