Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32131806›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Perceptions of scheduled vs. unscheduled directly observed visits in an internal medicine residency outpatient clinic.

Joanna Rea, Christopher Stephenson, Emily Leasure, Brianna Vaa, Andrew Halvorsen, Jill Huber, Sara Bonnes, Luke Hafdahl, Jason Post, Majken Wingo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joanna ReaMayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA. rea.joanna@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3071-5405
Christopher StephensonMayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA.
Emily LeasureMayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA.
Brianna VaaMayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA.
Andrew HalvorsenMayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA.
Jill HuberMayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA.
Sara BonnesMayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA.
Luke HafdahlMayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA.
Jason PostMayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA.
Majken WingoMayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLearners may subconsciously change their behavior once they know they are being observed, and this Hawthorne effect should be considered when designing assessments of learner behavior. While there is a growing body of literature to suggest direct observation is the ideal standard for formative assessment, the best method to directly observe learners is unknown. We explored scheduled and unscheduled methods of direct observation among internal medicine residents in the outpatient continuity clinic to advance the understanding of both observation methods.

methodsWe conducted a thematic analysis of faculty and internal medicine residents in an outpatient clinic setting. A semi-structured interview guide for focus group sessions was created. Focus groups were used to explore the internal medicine resident and core teaching faculty perceptions of the scheduled and unscheduled direct observation methods in the outpatient clinc. An experienced qualitative research interviewer external to the internal medicine residency was moderating the sessions. Eight peer focus groups were held. Abstraction of themes from focus group transcripts identified resident and faculty perceptions of the different observation methods.

resultsFocus groups had 14 resident participants and 14 faculty participants. Unscheduled observations were felt to be more authentic than scheduled observations since residents perceived their behavior to be unmodified. Unscheduled observations allowed for increased numbers of observations per resident, which permitted more frequent formative assessments. Residents and faculty preferred remote video observation compared to in-room observation. Participants found direct observation a useful learning tool for high-yield, specific feedback.

conclusionsUnscheduled remote direct observation captures authentic clinical encounters while minimizing learner behavior modification. An unscheduled observation approach results in more frequent formative assessment and therefore in more instances of valuable feedback compared to scheduled observations. These findings can help guide the best practice approaches to direct clinical observation in order to enhance residents learning and experience.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAmbulatory Care FacilitiesInternal MedicineInternship and ResidencyClinical CompetenceFocus GroupsHumansMinnesotaObservationQualitative ResearchCameraClinical practiceDirect observationFeedbackFormative assessmentInternal medicineLearningOutpatient clinicResident assessment

Identifiers

PMID32131806
PMCPMC7057513
OpenAlexW3011134216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.