Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32131805›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Effects of a single interprofessional simulation session on medical and nursing students' attitudes toward interprofessional learning and professional identity: a questionnaire study.

Bryan Burford, Paul Greig, Mike Kelleher, Clair Merriman, Alan Platt, Elize Richards, Neil Davidson, Gill Vance

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Outcomes of an Interprofessional Simulation Program for New Graduate Nurses.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bryan BurfordSchool of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Cookson Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 1HH, UK. bryan.burford@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4687-7556
Paul GreigNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mike KelleherDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Clair MerrimanDepartment of Nursing, Oxford Brooks University, Oxford, UK.
Alan PlattDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Elize RichardsMedical School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Neil DavidsonSchool of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Cookson Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 1HH, UK.
Gill VanceSchool of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Cookson Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 1HH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParticipation in simulation-based interprofessional education (sim-IPE) may affect students' attitudes towards interprofessional learning (through gaining experience with others) and their professional identity (by increasing the 'fit' of group membership). We examined this in two questionnaire studies involving students from four universities in two areas of the UK.

methodQuestionnaire data were collected before and after students took part in a sim-IPE session consisting of three acute scenarios. Questionnaires included the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) and measures of professional identity derived from the social identity theory literature. In Study 1, only identification with Professional Group (doctor or nurse) was measured, while in Study 2 identification with Student Group (medical or nursing student) and the immediate interprofessional Team worked with in the simulation were also measured. Linear mixed effects regression analysis examined the effect of the simulation session, and differences between medical and nursing students, sites and identity measures.

resultsA total of 194 medical and 266 nursing students completed questionnaires. A five-item subset of RIPLS (RIPLS

conclusionsParticipation in a sim-IPE session can improve attitudes towards interprofessional learning. It can also enhance professional identity, particularly as related to emotional aspects of group membership, with possible benefits for wellbeing. Changes in identification with the immediate Team suggest positive psychological consequences of ad hoc Team formation in the workplace. Differences between medical and nursing students suggest their differing opportunities to work with other professions during training may change baseline attitudes and identity. However, a single sim-IPE session can still have an additive effect.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelInterprofessional RelationsLearningSocial IdentificationAdultFemaleHumansMaleStudents, MedicalStudents, NursingSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultInterprofessional learningInterprofessional simulationMedical studentsNursing studentsProfessional identityRIPLSSimulationSocial identity theory

Identifiers

PMID32131805
PMCPMC7057493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.