Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32131795›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Effects of humorous interventions on the willingness to donate organs: a quasi-experimental study in the context of medical cabaret.

Lisa Heitland, Eckart von Hirschhausen, Florian Fischer

Open access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa HeitlandBielefeld University, School of Public Health, P.O. Box 100 131, 33501, Bielefeld, Germany.
Eckart von HirschhausenFoundation "Humor Hilft Heilen", Bennauer Str. 31, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Florian FischerBielefeld University, School of Public Health, P.O. Box 100 131, 33501, Bielefeld, Germany. f.fischer@uni-bielefeld.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4388-1245
Bielefeld University · DEBenue State University · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt has been shown that fears and misconceptions negatively affect the willingness to donate organs. Empirical studies have examined health communication strategies that serve to debunk these fears. There are promising indications that humor has the potential to influence health-related attitudes and behaviors. This study examines empirically whether medical cabaret, as a specific format for delivering health-related information in a humorous way, affects the willingness to donate organs.

methodsA quasi-experimental study was conducted among the audience of a medical cabaret live show. Participants in two intervention groups and one control group were interviewed just before the start of the live show (t

resultsA significant increase in the willingness to donate organs and an improvement in general attitude was observed in the intervention groups. Moreover, significantly more participants in I

conclusionsThe study confirms that medical cabaret is able to affect respondents' attitudes and behaviors even in the context of organ donation. Medical cabaret can enhance the willingness to donate organs and dispel negative concerns.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthTissue and Organ ProcurementWit and Humor as TopicAdultAgedFemaleHealth CommunicationHumansMaleMiddle AgedTissue DonorsYoung AdultHealth communicationHumorMedical cabaretOrgan donationOrgan transplantation

Identifiers

PMID32131795
PMCPMC7057630
OpenAlexW3010683029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.