Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32131793›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Conversations about alcohol in healthcare - cross-sectional surveys in the Netherlands and Sweden.

Latifa Abidi, Per Nilsen, Nadine Karlsson, Janna Skagerström, Amy O'Donnell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Latifa AbidiDepartment of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands. Latifa.abidi@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7086-5013
Per NilsenDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Nadine KarlssonDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Janna SkagerströmDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Amy O'DonnellPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluated and compared the extent, duration, contents, experiences and effects of alcohol conversations in healthcare in the Netherlands and Sweden in 2017.

methodsSurvey data in the Netherlands and Sweden were collected through an online web panel. Subjects were 2996 participants (response rate: 50.8%) in Sweden and 2173 (response rate: 82.2%) in the Netherlands. Data was collected on socio-demographics, alcohol consumption, healthcare visits in the past 12 months, number of alcohol conversations, and characteristics of alcohol conversations (duration, contents, experience, effects).

resultsResults showed that Swedish respondents were more likely to have had alcohol conversations (OR = 1.99; 95%CI = 1.64-2.41; p = < 0.001) compared to Dutch respondents. In Sweden, alcohol conversations were more often perceived as routine (p = < 0.001), were longer (p = < 0.001), and more often contained verbal information about alcohol's health effects (p = 0.007) or written information (p = 0.001) than in the Netherlands. In Sweden, 40+ year-olds were less likely to report a positive effect compared to the youngest respondents. In the Netherlands, men, sick-listed respondents, and risky drinkers, and in Sweden those that reported "other" occupational status such as parental leave, were more likely to have had alcohol conversations.

conclusionsThe results suggest that alcohol conversations are more common in healthcare practice in Sweden than in the Netherlands. However, positive effects of alcohol conversations were less likely to be reported among older respondents in Sweden. Our results indicate that alcohol preventative work should be improved in both countries, with more focus on risky drinkers and the content of the conversations in Sweden, and expanding alcohol screening in the Netherlands.

Indexed as

CommunicationProfessional-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAlcohol DrinkingCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsSwedenYoung AdultAlcoholBrief interventionHealthcareImplementationPrevention

Identifiers

PMID32131793
PMCPMC7057588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.