Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32131764›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2020

Sarcopenia as a predictor of mortality in women with breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Xiao-Ming Zhang, Qing-Li Dou, Yingchun Zeng, Yunzhi Yang, Andy S K Cheng, Wen-Wu Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiao-Ming ZhangDepartment of Emergency, The Affiliated Baoan Hospital of Southern Medical University, The People's Hospital of Baoan ShenZhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Qing-Li DouDepartment of Emergency, The Affiliated Baoan Hospital of Southern Medical University, The People's Hospital of Baoan ShenZhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yingchun ZengDepartment of Nursing, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yunzhi YangDepartment of Nursing, The Affiliated Baoan Hospital of Southern Medical University, The People's Hospital of Baoan ShenZhen, Shenzhen, China.
Andy S K ChengDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. andy.cheng@polyu.edu.hk.
Wen-Wu ZhangDepartment of Emergency, The Affiliated Baoan Hospital of Southern Medical University, The People's Hospital of Baoan ShenZhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. xlnzxm1793@163.com.
Southern Medical University · CNHong Kong Polytechnic University · HKShenzhen Bao'an District People's Hospital · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. Recently, studies have been published with inconsistent findings regarding whether sarcopenia is a risk factor for mortality in breast cancer patients. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to systematically assess and quantify sarcopenia as a risk factor for mortality in breast cancer patients.

methodsIn a systematic literature review of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane CENTRAL Library, we searched for observational studies written in English (from database inception until April 30, 2019) that reported an association between sarcopenia and breast cancer in women who were 18 years or older.

resultsA total of six studies (5497 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. Breast cancer patients with sarcopenia were associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality, compared to breast cancer patients without sarcopenia (pooled HR-hazard ratio = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.25-2.33, I

conclusionsThe present study found that sarcopenia is a risk factor for mortality among female early breast cancer patients. It is imperative that more research into specific interventions aimed at treating sarcopenia be conducted in the near future in order to provide evidence which could lead to decreased mortality rates in breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsSarcopeniaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicPrevalenceBreast cancerMortality rateSarcopeniaSystematic review and meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID32131764
PMCPMC7057618
OpenAlexW3011896336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.