Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32131736›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2020

Tracing cross species transmission of Mycobacterium bovis at the wildlife/livestock interface in South Africa.

Petronillah R Sichewo, Tiny M Hlokwe, Eric M C Etter, Anita L Michel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identification and molecular characterization ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Whole genome sequencing improves the discrimination betweenOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The Potential Risk of International Spread ofJournal of veterinary research · 2022
    Article
  16. Molecular characterization ofIranian journal of veterinary research · 2022
    Article
  17. Review of Diagnostic Tests for Detection ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Veterinary world · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Petronillah R SichewoDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Bovine Brucellosis and Tuberculosis Research Programme, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa. psichewo@gmail.com.
Tiny M HlokweDiagnostic Services Programme, ARC-Onderstepoort Veterinary Research, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa.
Eric M C EtterDepartment of Animal Production Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa.
Anita L MichelDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Bovine Brucellosis and Tuberculosis Research Programme, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa.
Midlands State University · ZWOnderstepoort Veterinary Institute · ZAUniversité de Montpellier · FRUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

Institute of Tropical Medicine-Belgium FA4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBovine tuberculosis (bTB) affects cattle and wildlife in South Africa with the African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) as the principal maintenance host. The presence of a wildlife maintenance host at the wildlife/livestock interface acting as spill-over host makes it much more challenging to control and eradicate bTB in cattle. Spoligotyping and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable number of tandem repeat (MIRU-VNTR) genotyping methods were performed to investigate the genetic diversity of Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) isolates from cattle and wildlife, their distribution and transmission at the wildlife/livestock interface in northern Kwa-Zulu Natal (KZN), South Africa.

resultsSB0130 was identified as the dominant spoligotype pattern at this wildlife/livestock interface, while VNTR typing revealed a total of 29 VNTR profiles (strains) in the KZN province signifying high genetic variability. The detection of 5 VNTR profiles shared between cattle and buffalo suggests M. bovis transmission between species. MIRU-VNTR confirmed co-infection in one cow with three strains of M. bovis that differed at a single locus, with 2 being shared with buffalo, implying pathogen introduction from most probably unrelated wildlife sources.

conclusionOur findings highlight inter and intra species transmission of bTB at the wildlife/livestock interface and the need for the implementation of adequate bTB control measures to mitigate the spread of the pathogen responsible for economic losses and a public health threat.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildBuffaloesCattleEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationGenotyping TechniquesLivestockMinisatellite RepeatsMycobacterium bovisPhylogenySouth AfricaTuberculosis, BovineAfrican buffaloBovine tuberculosis (bTB)CattleMycobacterium bovis (M. bovis)StrainsWildlifeWildlife/livestock interface

Identifiers

PMID32131736
PMCPMC7057561
OpenAlexW3012434749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.