Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2020
Sex Differences in 1-Year Health Status Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Without Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results From the China PEACE Prospective Study.
Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex differences in coronary disease health Status outcomes: the ISCHEMIA trial.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2026Trial
- Sex Differences in 1-Year Health Status Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Without Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results From the China PEACE Prospective Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Observational
- SCAI Expert Consensus Statement on Sex-Specific Considerations in Myocardial Revascularization.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background Sex differences in health status outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention among patients without acute myocardial infarction are not well described. Methods and Results A total of 2237 patients (33.4% women) without acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled from 39 Chinese tertiary hospitals in the PEACE (China Patient-centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events) prospective percutaneous coronary intervention study. Data were collected immediately before and 1 year following percutaneous coronary intervention. Health status was measured using the disease-specific Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Angina Frequency and Quality of Life domains, as well as the SAQ Summary Score. Among the study population, women were older, more often single, had lower levels of education, and had a higher prevalence of cardiac risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Women had lower mean 1-year SAQ Angina Frequency scores (mean±SD, 91.0±17.3 versus 93.9±13.3;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.