Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32131424›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Is the Piglet Grimace Scale (PGS) a Useful Welfare Indicator to Assess Pain after Cryptorchidectomy in Growing Pigs?

Cecilia Vullo, Sara Barbieri, Giuseppe Catone, Jean-Marie Graïc, Marco Magaletti, Ambra Di Rosa, Ambra Motta, Carlo Tremolada, Elisabetta Canali, Emanuela Dalla Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Review of Assessment of Sow Pain During Farrowing Using Grimace Scores.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Use of Abdominal Ultrasound to Improve the Cryptorchidectomy of Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Pain Management in Farm Animals: Focus on Cattle, Sheep and Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cecilia VulloDipartimento di ChiBioFarAm, Università degli Studi di Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Sara BarbieriDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3628-2129
Giuseppe CatoneDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Messina, 98168 Messina, Italy.
Jean-Marie GraïcDipartimento di Biomedicina Comparata e Alimentazione, Università degli Studi di Padova, 35020 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1974-8356
Marco MagalettiService de la Consommation et des affaires Vétérinaires de l'Etat de Genève (SCAV), 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Ambra Di RosaDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Messina, 98168 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6169-733X
Ambra MottaDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Carlo TremoladaDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Elisabetta CanaliDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Emanuela Dalla CostaDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5037-3759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pig cryptorchidism is a congenital anomaly, which requires surgical intervention. Pain assessment in pig farming has some limitations and consumers are increasingly concerned about suffering linked to on-farm procedures. The PGS seems to be a promising tool for pain assessment in piglets, although it has not been investigated whether this tool is applicable to growing pigs. This study was designed to determine whether the PGS could be useful to assess pain in growing pigs undergoing on-farm cryptorchidectomy. Ten mixed-breed cryptorchid pigs were pre-medicated with azaperone and ketamine. Anesthesia was induced and maintained using IV sodium based. Pigs were filmed pre- and 6 h post-surgery to evaluate their behavior (scan sampling every minute). Besides, 36 pictures of the face expressions (18 pre- and 18 6 h post-surgery) were scored with the PGS by three treatment-blind observers. The pre-surgery pig's activity ratio was 59%, while it was 2% 6 h post-surgery. While the PGS inter-observer reliability was excellent (Interclass Correlation Coefficient value of 0.87), the PGS score increased significantly in pigs 6 h post-surgery (Paired sample

Indexed as

behaviorcastrationpainpain assessmentpigpiglet grimace scale

Identifiers

PMID32131424
PMCPMC7143901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.