Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130672›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2021

Management of Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer with Bladder Preservation in Russia: a Survey-Based Analysis of Current Practice and the Impact of an Educational Workshop on Clinical Expertise.

Timur Mitin, Natalia Dengina, Marina Chernykh, Sergey Usychkin, Oleg Gladkov, Catherine Degnin, Yiyi Chen, Dmitry Nosov, Ilya Tsimafeyeu, Charles R Thomas and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Timur MitinDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. mitin@ohsu.edu.
Natalia DenginaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Ulyanovsk Regional Cancer Center, Ulyanovsk, Ulyanovsk oblast, Russia.
Marina ChernykhPET-Technology Podolsk, Podolsk, Russia.
Sergey UsychkinMedscan Clinic, Moscow, Russia.
Oleg GladkovEvimed Medical Center, Chelyabinsk, Russia.
Catherine DegninBiostatistics Shared Resources, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Yiyi ChenDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Dmitry NosovThe Central Clinical Hospital of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Ilya TsimafeyeuKidney Cancer Research Bureau, Moscow, Russia.
Charles R ThomasDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Sergei TjulandinN.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Center, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trimodality bladder preservation (BP) is an accepted alternative to radical cystectomy for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The global utilization of BP is variable, and practice patterns have not been previously studied in Russia. We sought to elucidate the contemporary BP practice patterns in Russia and determine the impact of the BP workshop on attitudes of Russian radiation oncologists (ROs) towards BP. The workshop was focused on patient workup, selection for BP, chemotherapy choices, radiation therapy (RT) contouring and planning, patient counseling. A total of 77 pre- and 32 matched post-workshop IRB-approved surveys, based on the workshop content, were analyzed using descriptive statistics to determine baseline clinical experience and patterns of care. The impact was judged by changes in participants' responses. A total of 56% of respondents had experience with delivering bladder-directed RT, and 60% of those treated both operable and inoperable MIBC patients. Only 10% felt uncomfortable offering an operable patient BP modality. Prior to the workshop, almost half of respondents estimated universal poor bladder (44%) and erectile functions (47%) after BP. The workshop resulted in dramatic change in participants' attitudes towards long-term urinary (Stuart-Maxwell test, p < 0.01) and sexual (exact McNemar test, p < 0.01) side effects. Prior to the workshop, only 47% of respondents routinely discussed smoking cessation (SC) with their patients, whereas after workshop, 88% agreed that SC discussion is mandatory (exact McNemar test, p = 0.04). BP for MIBC is commonly used in Russia. Our workshop resulted in dramatically improved understanding of long-term BP toxicities and inspired Russian ROs to incorporate SC counseling into routine clinical management.

Indexed as

Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsHumansMaleMusclesRussiaSurveys and QuestionnairesBladder cancerPractice patternsRadiation therapyRussiaSurvey

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.