Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130655›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2020

Spatial action-effect binding depends on type of action-effect transformation.

Marvin Liesner, Wladimir Kirsch, Roland Pfister, Wilfried Kunde

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Spatially incompatible tool use does not induce tactile neglect.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  3. On the Role of Interoception in Body and Object Perception: A Multisensory-Integration Account.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  4. Instant disembodiment of virtual body parts.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marvin LiesnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. marvin.liesner@uni-wuerzburg.de.
Wladimir KirschDepartment of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Roland PfisterDepartment of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Wilfried KundeDepartment of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
University of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial action-effect binding denotes the mutual attraction between the perceived position of an effector (e.g., one's own hand) and a distal object that is controlled by this effector. Such spatial binding can be construed as an implicit measure of object ownership, thus the belonging of a controlled object to the own body. The current study investigated how different transformations of hand movements (body-internal action component) into movements of a visual object (body-external action component) affect spatial action-effect binding, and thus implicit object ownership. In brief, participants had to bring a cursor on the computer screen into a predefined target position by moving their occluded hand on a tablet and had to estimate their final hand position. In Experiment 1, we found a significantly lower drift of the proprioceptive position of the hand towards the visual object when hand movements were transformed into laterally inverted cursor movements, rather than cursor movements in the same direction. Experiment 2 showed that this reduction reflected an elimination of spatial action-effect binding in the inverted condition. The results are discussed with respect to the prerequisites for an experience of ownership over artificial, noncorporeal objects. Our results show that predictability of an object movement alone is not a sufficient condition for ownership because, depending on the type of transformation, integration of the effector and a distal object can be fully abolished even under conditions of full controllability.

Indexed as

HandProprioceptionVisual PerceptionHumansMovementOrientation, SpatialAction–effect compatibilityAgencyBody ownershipIdeomotor theoryProprioceptive driftSpatial bindingTool use

Identifiers

PMID32130655
PMCPMC7343754
OpenAlexW3010090466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.