Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130646›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2020

Recursive multiresolution convolutional neural networks for 3D aortic valve annulus planimetry.

Pascal Theriault-Lauzier, Hind Alsosaimi, Negareh Mousavi, Jean Buithieu, Marco Spaziano, Giuseppe Martucci, James Brophy, Nicolo Piazza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Innovation in Interventional Cardiovascular Care.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pascal Theriault-LauzierDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada. ptheriault@ottawaheart.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6931-2673
Hind AlsosaimiDivision of Cardiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Negareh MousaviDivision of Cardiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jean BuithieuDivision of Cardiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Marco SpazianoDivision of Cardiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Giuseppe MartucciDivision of Cardiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
James BrophyDivision of Cardiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Nicolo PiazzaDivision of Cardiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the standard of care in a large population of patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. The sizing of TAVR devices is done from ECG-gated CT angiographic image volumes. The most crucial step of the analysis is the determination of the aortic valve annular plane. In this paper, we present a fully tridimensional recursive multiresolution convolutional neural network (CNN) to infer the location and orientation of the aortic valve annular plane.

methodsWe manually labeled 1007 ECG-gated CT volumes from 94 patients with severe degenerative aortic valve stenosis. The algorithm was implemented and trained using the TensorFlow framework (Google LLC, USA). We performed K-fold cross-validation with K = 9 groups such that CT volumes from a given patient are assigned to only one group.

resultsWe achieved an average out-of-plane localization error of (0.7 ± 0.6) mm for the training dataset and of (0.9 ± 0.8) mm for the evaluation dataset, which is on par with other published methods and clinically insignificant. The angular orientation error was (3.9 ± 2.3)° for the training dataset and (6.4 ± 4.0)° for the evaluation dataset. For the evaluation dataset, 84.6% of evaluation image volumes had a better than 10° angular error, which is similar to expert-level accuracy. When measured in the inferred annular plane, the relative measurement error was (4.73 ± 5.32)% for the annular area and (2.46 ± 2.94)% for the annular perimeter.

conclusionsThe proposed algorithm is the first application of CNN to aortic valve planimetry and achieves an accuracy on par with proposed automated methods for localization and approaches an expert-level accuracy for orientation. The method relies on no heuristic specific to the aortic valve and may be generalizable to other anatomical features.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHumansMachine LearningMaleMultidetector Computed TomographyNeural Networks, ComputerTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementHeartMachine learningNeural networkSegmentationX-ray imaging and computed tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.