ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Contrasting effects of iron reduction on thionation of diphenylarsinic acid in a biostimulated Acrisol.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Diphenylarsinic acid (DPAA) is an emerging phenylarsenic compound derived from chemical warfare agents. It has been suggested that biostimulation of sulfate reduction decreases the concentrations of DPAA in soils. However, biostimulation often induces Fe(III) reduction which may affect the mobility and thereby the transformation of DPAA. Here, a soil incubation experiment was carried out to elucidate the impact of Fe(III) reduction on the mobilization and transformation of DPAA in a biostimulated Acrisol with the addition of sulfate and lactate. DPAA was significantly mobilized and then thionated in the sulfide soil (amended with sulfate and sodium lactate) compared with the anoxic soil (without addition of sulfate or sodium lactate). At the start of the incubation period, 41.8% of the total DPAA in sulfide soil was mobilized, likely by the addition of sodium lactate, and DPAA was then almost completely released into the solution after 2 weeks of incubation, likely due to Fe(III) reduction. The relatively low fraction of oxalate-extractable Fe in Acrisol, which contributes significantly to DPAA sorption and is more active and reduction-susceptible, may explain the observation that only < 40% of the Fe(III) (hydr)oxides were reduced when DPAA was completely released into the solution. A more rapid and final enhanced elimination of DPAA was observed in sulfide soil and the fraction of total DPAA decreased to 60.1 and 91.0%, respectively, at the end of the incubation in sulfide soil and anoxic soil. The difference appears to result from increased DPAA mobilization and sulfate reduction in sulfide soil. On the other hand, the formation of FeS precipitate, a product of Fe and sulfate reduction, may reduce the efficiency of DPAA thionation. Accordingly, the potentially contrasting effects of Fe(III) reduction on DPAA thionation need be considered when planning biostimulated sulfate reduction strategies for DPAA-contaminated soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.