Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130596›Full record

ArticleJournal of fluorescence2020

A Simple Derivation of Diffusion Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy Equations.

Kyung Il Lee, Natasha Astudillo, Minchul Kang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fluorescence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kyung Il LeeDepartment of Mathematics, Texas A&M University-Commerce, Commerce, TX, 75428, USA.
Natasha AstudilloDepartment of Mathematics, Texas A&M University-Commerce, Commerce, TX, 75428, USA.
Minchul KangDepartment of Mathematics, Texas A&M University-Commerce, Commerce, TX, 75428, USA. Minchul.Kang@tamuc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9853-3216

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its introduction in the 1970s, Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS) has become a standard biophysical and physical chemistry tool to investigate not only a diffusion but also a broad range of biochemical processes including binding kinetics and anomalous diffusion. Since the derivation of FCS equations for many biochemical processes shares many common steps with the diffusion FCS equation, it is important to understand the mathematical theory behind the ​diffusion FCS equation. However, because the derivation of FCS equations requires advanced Fourier Transform and inverse Fourier Transform theory, which most biologists and biochemists are not familiar with, it is often treated as a black box in practice. In this study, we provide a simple and straightforward step-by-step derivation of FCS equations for free ​diffusion based on calculus-level mathematics, so that FCS equations and its applications can be accessible to a broad audience. Additionally, we compare our derivation with the conventional Fourier Transform and inverse Fourier Transform theory based approach.

Indexed as

Autocorrelation function​Diffusion processFluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.