Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130548›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental medicine2020

"Mixed connective tissue disease": a condition in search of an identity.

Marta R Alves, David A Isenberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marta R AlvesInternal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
David A IsenbergDivision of Medicine, Centre for Rheumatology, University College of London, Room 424, 4th Floor, Rayne Building, 5 University Street, London, WC1E 6JF, UK. d.isenberg@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9514-2455

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixed connective tissue disease was first described as a new autoimmune rheumatic disease in 1972 based on the claim of a distinct clinical picture associated with anti-RNP antibody positivity. Subsequently, this new entity has divided opinions in the rheumatology community. We have reviewed recent cohort studies with more than 100 patients, comparing the clinical and immunological features, treatment, prognosis and evolution to well-defined autoimmune rheumatic diseases. We also reviewed clinical features of undifferentiated autoimmune rheumatic diseases based on the most recent studies. After gathering and reviewing these data, we discuss whether the designation "mixed connective tissue disease" should be maintained.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesCohort StudiesFemaleHLA AntigensHumansMaleMixed Connective Tissue DiseasePrognosisHLA AntigensAnti-U1snRNPClinical featuresDisease evolutionGenetic featuresImmunologic featuresMixed connective tissue diseaseReviewUndifferentiated autoimmune rheumatic disease

Identifiers

PMID32130548
PMCPMC7181542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.