Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130512›Full record

ReviewMycorrhiza2020

The distribution and evolution of fungal symbioses in ancient lineages of land plants.

William R Rimington, Jeffrey G Duckett, Katie J Field, Martin I Bidartondo, Silvia Pressel

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mycorrhiza, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Two New Species ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The receptor-like kinase ARK controls symbiotic balance across land plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. The biology ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. What can hornworts teach us?Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Unique and common traits in mycorrhizal symbioses.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

William R RimingtonDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Jeffrey G DuckettDepartment of Life Sciences, Algae, Fungi and Plants Division, Natural History Museum, London, London, SW7 5BD, UK.
Katie J FieldCentre for Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Martin I BidartondoDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Silvia PresselDepartment of Life Sciences, Algae, Fungi and Plants Division, Natural History Museum, London, London, SW7 5BD, UK. s.pressel@nhm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9652-6338
Natural History Museum · GBRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M026825/1Natural Environment Resarch Council NE/N009665/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/N00941X/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/N0094X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An accurate understanding of the diversity and distribution of fungal symbioses in land plants is essential for mycorrhizal research. Here we update the seminal work of Wang and Qiu (Mycorrhiza 16:299-363, 2006) with a long-overdue focus on early-diverging land plant lineages, which were considerably under-represented in their survey, by examining the published literature to compile data on the status of fungal symbioses in liverworts, hornworts and lycophytes. Our survey combines data from 84 publications, including recent, post-2006, reports of Mucoromycotina associations in these lineages, to produce a list of at least 591 species with known fungal symbiosis status, 180 of which were included in Wang and Qiu (Mycorrhiza 16:299-363, 2006). Using this up-to-date compilation, we estimate that fewer than 30% of liverwort species engage in symbiosis with fungi belonging to all three mycorrhizal phyla, Mucoromycota, Basidiomycota and Ascomycota, with the last being the most widespread (17%). Fungal symbioses in hornworts (78%) and lycophytes (up to 100%) appear to be more common but involve only members of the two Mucoromycota subphyla Mucoromycotina and Glomeromycotina, with Glomeromycotina prevailing in both plant groups. Our fungal symbiosis occurrence estimates are considerably more conservative than those published previously, but they too may represent overestimates due to currently unavoidable assumptions.

Indexed as

EmbryophytaGlomeromycotaMycorrhizaeFungiPhylogenySymbiosisArbuscular mycorrhizasEricoid mycorrhizasHornwortsLiverwortsLycophytesMucoromycota

Identifiers

PMID32130512
PMCPMC7062687
OpenAlexW3010157844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.