Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130508›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

Chemotherapy-induced nausea in a sample of gynaecological cancer patients: assessment issues and personal risk factors evaluation.

Valentina E Di Mattei, Letizia Carnelli, Paola Taranto, Martina Mazzetti, Gaia Perego, Sara Rottoli, Paola M V Rancoita, Alice Bergamini, Micaela Petrone, Emanuela Rabaiotti and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Socio-demographic and psychological factors associated with quality of life of women undergoing chemotherapy treatment for gynecological cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Valentina E Di MatteiSchool of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Letizia CarnelliDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, Health Psychology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. carnelli.letizia@hsr.it.
Paola TarantoDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, Health Psychology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Martina MazzettiDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, Health Psychology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Gaia PeregoDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Sara RottoliDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, Health Psychology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Paola M V RancoitaUniversity Centre of Statistics in Biomedical Sciences CUSSB, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Alice BergaminiSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Micaela PetroneDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Emanuela RabaiottiDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio CandottiDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Massimo CandianiSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChemotherapy-induced nausea (CIN) is a relevant problem for gynaecological cancer patients. The evaluation of CIN is a key aspect in its management, along with the identification of associated risk factors. The objective of the study was to compare different measurements of nausea and to investigate personal risk factors in CIN development.

methodEighty-one women treated for gynaecological cancers took part. The presence of CIN was evaluated using the MASCC Antiemesis Tool (MAT) and a patient's report to clinicians at the subsequent chemotherapy cycle. Personal risk factors were assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and a self-report questionnaire.

resultsThe study shows that the agreement between patients' assessment of CIN with MAT and what they referred to clinicians was only moderate for acute nausea (Cohen's Kappa = 0.55; p < 0.001), while good for delayed nausea (Cohen's Kappa = 0.68; p < 0.001). At multiple logistic regression analysis, younger age, anticipatory nausea, patient medium-high expectations of CIN, and parity emerged as risk factors for the development of acute nausea (p = 0.0087, 0.0080, 0.0122 and 0.0021, respectively). Patient medium-high expectations of CIN and being single resulted to be risk factors for delayed nausea (p = 0.0397 and 0.0024, respectively).

conclusionsOur findings confirm that personal factors contribute to individual differences in the development of CIN; moreover, we highlight the importance of CIN evaluation by clinicians, underlining the need to use reliable instruments.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCarboplatinFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansInduction ChemotherapyMiddle AgedNauseaPaclitaxelPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBevacizumabCarboplatinPaclitaxelChemotherapy-induced nauseaChemotherapy-induced nausea assessmentGynaecological cancerRisk factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.