Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130471›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hematology2020

DCEP and bendamustine/prednisone as salvage therapy for quad- and penta-refractory multiple myeloma.

Scott R Goldsmith, Mark A Fiala, Brandon Wang, Mark A Schroeder, Tanya M Wildes, Armin Ghobadi, Keith Stockerl-Goldstein, Ravi Vij

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Scott R GoldsmithDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, Box 8056, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. goldsm.s@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9216-2418
Mark A FialaDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, Box 8056, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Brandon WangDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, Box 8056, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Mark A SchroederDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, Box 8056, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Tanya M WildesDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, Box 8056, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Armin GhobadiDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, Box 8056, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Keith Stockerl-GoldsteinDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, Box 8056, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Ravi VijDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, Box 8056, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) almost invariably progresses through novel therapies. Patients with quad-refractory MM (refractory to bortezomib, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide) and penta-refractory MM (additional refractoriness to daratumumab) have few treatment options. Two chemotherapy regimens, bendamustine/prednisone (BP) and dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (DCEP), are often used in quad- and penta-refractory MM, but there are limited data on outcomes in this heavily pre-treated population. We conducted a single-center retrospective study to identify all patients who received DCEP and/or BP for quad- or penta-refractory MM. Disease response and refractoriness were defined by International Myeloma Working Group criteria. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DOR). We identified 27 patients who received BP for quad- or penta-refractory MM. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 6. The ORR for BP was 26%. The median PFS for BP was 1.4 months (95% CI 1.1-1.6) and median OS was 8.7 months (95% CI 2.3-15.0). Patients treated with cyclophosphamide had less response to BP. Thirty-one patients received DCEP for quad-refractory or penta-refractory MM. The median number of prior treatment regimens was 8. The ORR to DCEP was 35%. The median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI 1.5-3.8) and median OS was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.4-7.8). DCEP and BP retain efficacy in quad- and penta-refractory MM. Our analysis supports prospective study of these regimens, possibly in combination or in comparison with other agents in this area of unmet need.

Indexed as

Salvage TherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBendamustine HydrochlorideCisplatinCyclophosphamideDexamethasoneDisease-Free SurvivalEtoposideFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaBendamustine HydrochlorideCisplatinCyclophosphamideDexamethasoneEtoposidePrednisoloneBendamustineDCEPPenta-refractory multiple myelomaQuad-refractory multiple myelomaSalvage therapy

Identifiers

PMID32130471
OpenAlexW3009113141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.