Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130451›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2020

Diltiazem Prophylaxis for the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Thoracoabdominal Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Marcel Hochreiter, Thomas Schmidt, Benedikt H Siegler, Leila Sisic, Karsten Schmidt, Thomas Bruckner, Beat P Müller-Stich, Markus K Diener, Markus A Weigand, Markus W Büchler and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marcel HochreiterDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Thomas SchmidtDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Benedikt H SieglerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Leila SisicDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karsten SchmidtDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Thomas BrucknerInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Beat P Müller-StichDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus K DienerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus A WeigandDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus W BüchlerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Cornelius J BuschDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. cornelius.busch@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DEHeidelberg University · DEEssen University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most frequent arrhythmic disorder after thoracoabdominal esophageal resection and is associated with a significant increase in perioperative morbidity and mortality.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, 167 patients who underwent thoracoabdominal esophagectomy at a large university hospital were assessed. We compared patients who received a 14-day postoperative course of diltiazem with a control group of patients who did not undergo diltiazem prophylaxis. Diltiazem therapy started immediately upon admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a loading dose of 0.25 mg/kg bodyweight (i.v.) followed by continuous infusion (0.1 mg/kg bodyweight/h) for 40-48 h. Oral administration (Dilzem

resultsA total of 117 patients were assessed. Twelve (10.3%) of all patients developed postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation in the first 30 days after surgical intervention. Prevalence of new-onset AF showed no significant differences between the diltiazem group and control group (p = 0.74). The prevalence of bradycardia (14.7% vs. 3.6%; p = 0.03) and dose of norepinephrine required (0.09 vs. 0.04 µg/kg bodyweight/min; p = 0.04) were higher in the diltiazem group. There were no significant differences between the groups for the median postoperative duration of hospital/ICU stay or mortality.

conclusionsA prophylactic 14-day postoperative course of diltiazem was not associated with a reduction in new-onset AF or 30-day mortality following thoracoabdominal esophagectomy. Prophylactic diltiazem therapy was associated with drug-related adverse effects such as bradycardia and increased requirement of norepinephrine. German Clinical Trial Registration Number: DKRS00016631.

Indexed as

EsophagectomyAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAtrial FibrillationCardiovascular AgentsDiltiazemDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedCardiovascular AgentsDiltiazem

Identifiers

PMID32130451
PMCPMC7266852
OpenAlexW3010273970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.