Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130359›Full record

Trial reportJornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia

Azithromycin administered for acute bronchiolitis may have a protective effect on subsequent wheezing.

Fernanda Luisi, Clarissa Aires Roza, Victória d'Azevedo Silveira, Camila Correia Machado, Katiana Murieli da Rosa, Paulo Márcio Pitrez, Marcus Herbert Jones, Renato Tetelbom Stein, Lidiane Alves de Azeredo Leitão, Talitha Comaru and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Azithromycin in acute bronchiolitis.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fernanda LuisiPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8776-7228
Clarissa Aires RozaUniversidade de Santa Cruz do Sul, Santa Cruz do Sul (RS) Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0127-0013
Victória d'Azevedo SilveiraPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3264-0374
Camila Correia MachadoPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5138-3046
Katiana Murieli da RosaPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7120-3022
Paulo Márcio PitrezPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-1133
Marcus Herbert JonesPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8263-1265
Renato Tetelbom SteinPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0269-0757
Lidiane Alves de Azeredo LeitãoPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9435-9748
Talitha ComaruPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3574-6318
Magáli MocellinPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1550-2313
Leonardo Araújo PintoPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3906-5456

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA significant proportion of the infants developed recurrent wheezing after an acute bronchiolitis (AB) event. Recent studies have demonstrated protection for recurrent wheeze and lower respiratory morbidity in infants treated with azithromycin during an acute respiratory wheezing. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that administration of azithromycin during an AB event reduces subsequent wheezing and hospital re-admissions.

methodsThis is a secondary analysis of a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, including unpublished data of wheezing and hospitalizations during the initial 6 months following admission for acute viral bronchiolitis. The study was performed in a tertiary University hospital. Infants (<12 months of age) hospitalized with AB were randomized to receive either azithromycin or placebo, administered orally, for 7 days. Families were contacted by telephone at 3 and 6 months after the initial acute event and answered to a standardized questionnaire in order to identify recurrent wheezing and hospital readmissions.

resultsOne hundred and four patients were included (Azithromycin group, n= 50; placebo group, n=54). Considering the total of patients contacted 3 months after hospitalization (n=70), the recurrence rate of wheezing in the azithromycin group was significantly lower than in the placebo group (RR = 0.48; CI = 0.24-0.98; p = 0.038).

conclusionAzithromycin significantly reduces the risk of subsequent wheezing between 0 and 3 months after hospital admission due to acute bronchiolitis irrespective of the presence of respiratory syncytial virus.

Indexed as

AzithromycinBronchiolitisHospitalizationHumansInfantRecurrenceRespiratory SoundsTreatment OutcomeAzithromycin

Identifiers

PMID32130359
PMCPMC8650811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.