Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130249›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Changes in SGLT2i and GLP-1RA real-world initiator profiles following cardiovascular outcome trials: A Danish nationwide population-based study.

Jakob S Knudsen, Lisbeth M Baggesen, Maria Lajer, Larisa Nurkanovic, Anastasia Ustyugova, Henrik T Sørensen, Reimar W Thomsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jakob S KnudsenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3772-4497
Lisbeth M BaggesenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Maria LajerBoehringer Ingelheim, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Larisa NurkanovicBoehringer Ingelheim, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Anastasia UstyugovaBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Henrik T SørensenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Reimar W ThomsenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9135-3474
Aarhus University Hospital · DKBoehringer Ingelheim (Denmark) · DKBoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated changes in clinical characteristics of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA real-world initiators in Denmark before/after landmark cardiovascular outcome trials.

methodsWe compared first-time SGLT2i (25,070) and GLP-1RA (14,671) initiators to initiators of DPP-4i (n = 34,079), a class without proven cardiovascular benefits. We used linked population-based healthcare data to examine initiation incidence, medication patterns, and pre-existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) during 2014-2017.

resultsNationwide incidence of SGLT2i initiators increased 3.6-fold (53/100,000 to 172/100,000 per year) vs. a 1.5-fold increase for GLP-1RA. DPP-4i initiation remained stable. From the end of 2015, SGLT2i was increasingly used as 2nd-line therapy, while medication patterns were much more stable for GLP-1RA. Among SGLT2i users, ASCVD increased slightly from 28% to 30%; age- and gender-adj. prevalence ratio (aPR) = 1.03 (95% CI:0.97-1.10). In contrast, among GLP-1RA initiators, baseline ASCVD declined from 29% to 27% (aPR: 0.90 (95% CI:0.84-0.97)), and in DPP-4i initiators from 31% to 29% (aPR: 0.91 (95% CI:0.88-0.96)).

conclusionsFollowing the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial in 2015, SGLT2i have become increasingly used as 2nd-line treatment in everyday clinical practice, with only minor increases in patient proportions with ASCVD. For GLP-1RA, we observed more stable therapy lines and slightly decreasing ASCVD in new users despite the LEADER trial.

Indexed as

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceDipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHypoglycemic AgentsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32130249
PMCPMC7055862
OpenAlexW3009151641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.