Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130229›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Immunotherapy with DNA vaccine and live attenuated rubella/SIV gag vectors plus early ART can prevent SIVmac251 viral rebound in acutely infected rhesus macaques.

Konstantin Virnik, Margherita Rosati, Alexei Medvedev, Aaron Scanlan, Gabrielle Walsh, Frances Dayton, Kate E Broderick, Mark Lewis, Yvonne Bryson, Jeffrey D Lifson and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Konstantin VirnikLaboratory of Immunoregulation, Division of Viral Products, Office of Vaccines, Center for Biologics, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2858-1172
Margherita RosatiHuman Retrovirus Section, Vaccine Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Alexei MedvedevLaboratory of Immunoregulation, Division of Viral Products, Office of Vaccines, Center for Biologics, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Aaron ScanlanLaboratory of Immunoregulation, Division of Viral Products, Office of Vaccines, Center for Biologics, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Gabrielle WalshLaboratory of Immunoregulation, Division of Viral Products, Office of Vaccines, Center for Biologics, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0600-1034
Frances DaytonHuman Retrovirus Section, Vaccine Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4473-1951
Kate E BroderickInovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Mark LewisBioQual, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Yvonne BrysonDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Disease, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1589-269X
Jeffrey D LifsonAIDS and Cancer Virus Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Ruth M RuprechtUniversity of Louisiana at Lafayette, New Iberia Research Center, New Iberia, Louisiana, United States of America.
Barbara K FelberHuman Retrovirus Pathogenesis Section, Vaccine Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Ira BerkowerLaboratory of Immunoregulation, Division of Viral Products, Office of Vaccines, Center for Biologics, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6337-3136
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USBioqual · USInovio Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Louisiana at Lafayette · US

Funding

Prevention of AIDSZIABC010350 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI FELBER, BARBARA K · 2009 to 2025
$30.0M
Functional cure and virus eradication by early HAART plus vaccination with live attenuated rubella virus vectors in macaque infants and neonatesR01AI118586 · NIAID · TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI RUPRECHT, RUTH MARGRIT · 2015 to 2018
$5.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-retroviral therapy (ART) has been highly successful in controlling HIV replication, reducing viral burden, and preventing both progression to AIDS and viral transmission. Yet, ART alone cannot cure the infection. Even after years of successful therapy, ART withdrawal leads inevitably to viral rebound within a few weeks or months. Our hypothesis: effective therapy must control both the replicating virus pool and the reactivatable latent viral reservoir. To do this, we have combined ART and immunotherapy to attack both viral pools simultaneously. The vaccine regimen consisted of DNA vaccine expressing SIV Gag, followed by a boost with live attenuated rubella/gag vectors. The vectors grow well in rhesus macaques, and they are potent immunogens when used in a prime and boost strategy. We infected rhesus macaques by high dose mucosal challenge with virulent SIVmac251 and waited three days to allow viral dissemination and establishment of a reactivatable viral reservoir before starting ART. While on ART, the control group received control DNA and empty rubella vaccine, while the immunotherapy group received DNA/gag prime, followed by boosts with rubella vectors expressing SIV gag over 27 weeks. Both groups had a vaccine "take" to rubella, and the vaccine group developed antibodies and T cells specific for Gag. Five weeks after the last immunization, we stopped ART and monitored virus rebound. All four control animals eventually had a viral rebound, and two were euthanized for AIDS. One control macaque did not rebound until 2 years after ART release. In contrast, there was only one viral rebound in the vaccine group. Three out of four vaccinees had no viral rebound, even after CD8 depletion, and they remain in drug-free viral remission more than 2.5 years later. The strategy of early ART combined with immunotherapy can produce a sustained SIV remission in macaques and may be relevant for immunotherapy of HIV in humans.

Indexed as

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAnimalsAnti-HIV AgentsCombined Modality TherapyDisease Models, AnimalDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationGene Products, gagGenetic VectorsHumansMacaca mulattaPlasmidsRubella virusSAIDS VaccinesSimian Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeSimian Immunodeficiency VirusAnti-HIV AgentsGene Products, gagSAIDS VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID32130229
PMCPMC7055890
OpenAlexW3009139392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.