Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130199›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Lumbar Intervertebral Motion Analysis During Flexion and Extension Cinematographic Recordings in Healthy Male Participants: Protocol.

Inge Jmh Caelers, Toon Fm Boselie, Kim Rijkers, Wouter Lw Van Hemert, Rob A De Bie, Henk Van Santbrink

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03737227 (Analysis of Lumbar Intervertebral Motion During Flexion and Extension Cinematographic Recordings in Asymptomatic Male Participants.), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03737227 nacompletednot on this map

Analysis of Lumbar Intervertebral Motion During Flexion and Extension Cinematographic Recordings in Asymptomatic Male Participants.

TypeinterventionalSponsorZuyderland Medisch CentrumRan2019 to 2020Enrolled11ConditionsLumbar Intervertebral MotionArmsCinematographic recording
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Inge Jmh CaelersCAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2662-7357
Toon Fm BoselieDepartment of Neurosurgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3105-9710
Kim RijkersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3348-158X
Wouter Lw Van HemertDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5498-4741
Rob A De BieCAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5882-9303
Henk Van SantbrinkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8187-6044
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLMaastricht University · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysiological motion of the lumbar spine is a subject of interest for musculoskeletal health care professionals, as abnormal motion is believed to be related to lumbar conditions and complaints. Many researchers have described ranges of motion for the lumbar spine, but only a few have mentioned specific motion patterns of each individual segment during flexion and extension. These motion patterns mostly comprise the sequence of segmental initiation in sagittal rotation. However, an adequate definition of physiological motion of the lumbar spine is still lacking. The reason for this is the reporting of different ranges of motion and sequences of segmental initiation in previous studies. Furthermore, due to insufficient fields of view, none of these papers have reported on maximum flexion and extension motion patterns of L1 to S1. In the lower cervical spine, a consistent pattern of segmental contributions was recently described. In order to understand physiological motion of the lumbar spine, it is necessary to systematically study motion patterns, including the sequence of segmental contribution, of vertebrae L1 to S1 in healthy individuals during maximum flexion and extension.

objectiveThis study aims to define the lumbar spines' physiological motion pattern of vertebrae L1, L2, L3, L4, L5, and S1 by determining the sequence of segmental contribution and the sequence of segmental initiation of motion in sagittal rotation of each vertebra during maximum flexion and extension. The secondary endpoint will be exploring the possibility of analyzing the intervertebral horizontal and vertical translation of each vertebra during maximum flexion and extension.

methodsCinematographic recordings will be performed in 11 healthy male participants, aged 18-25 years, without a history of spine problems. Cinematographic flexion and extension recordings will be made at two time points with a minimum 2-week interval in between.

resultsThe study has been approved by the local institutional medical ethical committee (Medical Research Ethics Committee of Zuyderland and Zuyd University of applied sciences) on September 24, 2018. Inclusion of participants will be completed in 2020.

conclusionsIf successful, these physiological motion patterns can be compared with motion patterns of patients with lumbar conditions before or after surgery. Ultimately, researchers may be able to determine differences in biomechanics that can potentially be linked to physical complaints like low back pain.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03737227; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03737227. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/14741.

Indexed as

cinematographic recordingsextensionflexionfundamental researchlumbar spinemotion patternrotationtranslation

Identifiers

PMID32130199
PMCPMC7078620
OpenAlexW3010516156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.