Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130152›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020

Optimizing Antihypertensive Medication Classification in Electronic Health Record-Based Data: Classification System Development and Methodological Comparison.

Caitrin W McDonough, Steven M Smith, Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff, William R Hogan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caitrin W McDonoughDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6393-7288
Steven M SmithDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0201-839X
Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoffDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5198-130X
William R HoganDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9881-1017
University of Florida · US

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
Together: Transforming and Translating Discovery to Improve HealthKL2TR001429 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI GUIRGIS, FAHEEM W, LEEUWENBURGH, CHRISTIAAN · 2015 to 2023
$5.5M
Advancing Personalized Hypertension Care through Big Data ScienceK01HL138172 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SMITH, STEVEN MICHAEL · 2018 to 2022
$726k
INTEGRATIVE DATA APPROACHES FOR RESISTANT HYPERTENSION IDENTIFICATION AND PREDICTIONK01HL141690 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MCDONOUGH, CAITRIN W · 2018 to 2021
$486k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001429NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL138172NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL141690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputable phenotypes have the ability to utilize data within the electronic health record (EHR) to identify patients with certain characteristics. Many computable phenotypes rely on multiple types of data within the EHR including prescription drug information. Hypertension (HTN)-related computable phenotypes are particularly dependent on the correct classification of antihypertensive prescription drug information, as well as corresponding diagnoses and blood pressure information.

objectiveThis study aimed to create an antihypertensive drug classification system to be utilized with EHR-based data as part of HTN-related computable phenotypes.

methodsWe compared 4 different antihypertensive drug classification systems based off of 4 different methodologies and terminologies, including 3 RxNorm Concept Unique Identifier (RxCUI)-based classifications and 1 medication name-based classification. The RxCUI-based classifications utilized data from (1) the Drug Ontology, (2) the new Medication Reference Terminology, and (3) the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System and DrugBank, whereas the medication name-based classification relied on antihypertensive drug names. Each classification system was applied to EHR-based prescription drug data from hypertensive patients in the OneFlorida Data Trust.

resultsThere were 13,627 unique RxCUIs and 8025 unique medication names from the 13,879,046 prescriptions. We observed a broad overlap between the 4 methods, with 84.1% (691/822) to 95.3% (695/729) of terms overlapping pairwise between the different classification methods. Key differences arose from drug products with multiple dosage forms, drug products with an indication of benign prostatic hyperplasia, drug products that contain more than 1 ingredient (combination products), and terms within the classification systems corresponding to retired or obsolete RxCUIs.

conclusionsIn total, 2 antihypertensive drug classifications were constructed, one based on RxCUIs and one based on medication name, that can be used in future computable phenotypes that require antihypertensive drug classifications.

Indexed as

antihypertensive agentsclassificationelectronic health recordsphenotypeRxNorm

Identifiers

PMID32130152
PMCPMC7068459
OpenAlexW2995134651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.