ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020
Explanatory Model of Dry Eye Disease Using Health and Nutrition Examinations: Machine Learning and Network-Based Factor Analysis From a National Survey.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Decoding and reconstructing disease relations between dry eye and depression: a multimodal investigation comprising meta-analysis, genetic pathways and Mendelian randomization.Journal of advanced research · 2025Pooled it
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for dry eye disease in myopic children.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review Comparing Artificial Intelligence and Clinical Diagnostic Approaches for Dry Eye Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Classifying Dry Eye Disease Patients from Healthy Controls Using Machine Learning and Metabolomics Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- An efficient enhanced stacked auto encoder assisted optimized deep neural network for forecasting Dry Eye Disease.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Role of artificial intelligence in cornea practice.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- How to apply variable selection machine learning algorithms with multiply imputed data: A missing discussion.Psychological methods · 2023Article
- Integration of Artificial Intelligence into the Approach for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Dry Eye Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Neural Network-Based Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Profile Compensation for Glaucoma Diagnosis in Myopia: Model Development and Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Dry Eye: Workflows, Effectiveness, and Evaluation.Journal of current ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDry eye disease (DED) is a complex disease of the ocular surface, and its associated factors are important for understanding and effectively treating DED.
objectiveThis study aimed to provide an integrative and personalized model of DED by making an explanatory model of DED using as many factors as possible from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) data.
methodsUsing KNHANES data for 2012 (4391 sample cases), a point-based scoring system was created for ranking factors associated with DED and assessing patient-specific DED risk. First, decision trees and lasso were used to classify continuous factors and to select important factors, respectively. Next, a survey-weighted multiple logistic regression was trained using these factors, and points were assigned using the regression coefficients. Finally, network graphs of partial correlations between factors were utilized to study the interrelatedness of DED-associated factors.
resultsThe point-based model achieved an area under the curve of 0.70 (95% CI 0.61-0.78), and 13 of 78 factors considered were chosen. Important factors included sex (+9 points for women), corneal refractive surgery (+9 points), current depression (+7 points), cataract surgery (+7 points), stress (+6 points), age (54-66 years; +4 points), rhinitis (+4 points), lipid-lowering medication (+4 points), and intake of omega-3 (0.43%-0.65% kcal/day; -4 points). Among these, the age group 54 to 66 years had high centrality in the network, whereas omega-3 had low centrality.
conclusionsIntegrative understanding of DED was possible using the machine learning-based model and network-based factor analysis. This method for finding important risk factors and identifying patient-specific risk could be applied to other multifactorial diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.