Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130148›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020

Analyzing Medical Research Results Based on Synthetic Data and Their Relation to Real Data Results: Systematic Comparison From Five Observational Studies.

Anat Reiner Benaim, Ronit Almog, Yuri Gorelik, Irit Hochberg, Laila Nassar, Tanya Mashiach, Mogher Khamaisi, Yael Lurie, Zaher S Azzam, Johad Khoury and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Circadian immunity from bench to bedside: a practical guide.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anat Reiner BenaimClinical Epidemiology Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8709-3112
Ronit AlmogClinical Epidemiology Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9190-515X
Yuri GorelikDepartment of Internal Medicine D, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2070-5182
Irit HochbergInstitute of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4232-5191
Laila NassarClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Section, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8243-3827
Tanya MashiachClinical Epidemiology Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6024-0442
Mogher KhamaisiDepartment of Internal Medicine D, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8897-5456
Yael LurieThe Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0302-342X
Zaher S AzzamDepartment of Internal Medicine B, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7355-5400
Johad KhouryDepartment of Internal Medicine B, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8048-1542
Daniel KurnikThe Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8462-7673
Rafael BeyarThe Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3135-7304

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrivacy restrictions limit access to protected patient-derived health information for research purposes. Consequently, data anonymization is required to allow researchers data access for initial analysis before granting institutional review board approval. A system installed and activated at our institution enables synthetic data generation that mimics data from real electronic medical records, wherein only fictitious patients are listed.

objectiveThis paper aimed to validate the results obtained when analyzing synthetic structured data for medical research. A comprehensive validation process concerning meaningful clinical questions and various types of data was conducted to assess the accuracy and precision of statistical estimates derived from synthetic patient data.

methodsA cross-hospital project was conducted to validate results obtained from synthetic data produced for five contemporary studies on various topics. For each study, results derived from synthetic data were compared with those based on real data. In addition, repeatedly generated synthetic datasets were used to estimate the bias and stability of results obtained from synthetic data.

resultsThis study demonstrated that results derived from synthetic data were predictive of results from real data. When the number of patients was large relative to the number of variables used, highly accurate and strongly consistent results were observed between synthetic and real data. For studies based on smaller populations that accounted for confounders and modifiers by multivariate models, predictions were of moderate accuracy, yet clear trends were correctly observed.

conclusionsThe use of synthetic structured data provides a close estimate to real data results and is thus a powerful tool in shaping research hypotheses and accessing estimated analyses, without risking patient privacy. Synthetic data enable broad access to data (eg, for out-of-organization researchers), and rapid, safe, and repeatable analysis of data in hospitals or other health organizations where patient privacy is a primary value.

Indexed as

big data analysiselectronic medical recordsMDClonesynthetic datavalidation study

Identifiers

PMID32130148
PMCPMC7059086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.