Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130129›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Evaluating the Effect of Daily Diary Instructional Phrases on Respondents' Recall Time Frames: Survey Experiment.

Arthur A Stone, Cheng K Fred Wen, Stefan Schneider, Doerte U Junghaenel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mood reactivity to daily family stressors among transgender and nonbinary parents during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arthur A StoneCenter for Self-Report Science and Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7490-1758
Cheng K Fred WenCenter for Self-Report Science and Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2538-0439
Stefan SchneiderCenter for Self-Report Science and Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4562-0524
Doerte U JunghaenelCenter for Self-Report Science and Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7733-571X

Funding

Advancing the Science and Practice of Ecological Momentary AssessmentR37AG057685 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Arthur A Stone · 2018 to 2026
$9.4M
Frame of Reference Effects in Health Disparities ResearchR01AG042407 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI STONE, ARTHUR A · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG042407NIA NIH HHS R37 AG057685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDaily diaries are extensively used for examining participants' daily experience in behavioral and medical science. However, little attention is paid to whether participants recall their experiences within the time frames prescribed by the task.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe survey respondents' self-reported recall time frames and to evaluate the impact of different daily diary items on respondents' reported affective states.

methodsIn this study, 577 participants completed a mood survey with one of the following 4 time frame instructions: (1) today, (2) since waking up today, (3) during the last 24 hours, or (4) in the last day. They were also asked to indicate the periods they considered when answering these items and to recall the instructional phrases associated with the items.

resultsAlmost all participants in the today (141/146, 96.6%) and since waking up today (136/145, 93.8%) conditions reported using periods consistent with our expectations, whereas a lower proportion was observed in the during the last 24 hours (100/145, 69.0%) condition. A diverse range of responses was observed in the in the last day condition. Furthermore, the instructions influenced the levels of some self-reported affects, although exploratory analyses were not able to identify the mechanism underlying this finding.

conclusionsOverall, these results indicate that today and since waking up today are the most effective instructional phrases for inquiring about daily experience and that investigators should use caution when using the other 2 instructional phrases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDiaries as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallMiddle AgedSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factorsdaily diary studyend-of-day dairyrecall time frame

Identifiers

PMID32130129
PMCPMC7060498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.