Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130125›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

The Systematic Medical Appraisal Referral and Treatment Mental Health Project: Quasi-Experimental Study to Evaluate a Technology-Enabled Mental Health Services Delivery Model Implemented in Rural India.

Pallab K Maulik, Siddhardha Devarapalli, Sudha Kallakuri, Amritendu Bhattacharya, David Peiris, Anushka Patel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Pallab K Maulik *George Insitute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6835-6175
Siddhardha DevarapalliGeorge Insitute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1411-8846
Sudha KallakuriGeorge Insitute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0552-2417
Amritendu BhattacharyaGeorge Insitute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6237-7290
David PeirisUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6898-3870
Anushka PatelUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3825-4092
George Institute for Global Health · INUNSW Sydney · AUThe George Institute for Global Health · GB

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/I/13/1/500879Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough around 10% of Indians experience depression, anxiety, or alcohol use disorders, very few receive adequate mental health care, especially in rural communities. Stigma and limited availability of mental health services contribute to this treatment gap. The Systematic Medical Appraisal Referral and Treatment Mental Health project aimed to address this gap.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention in increasing the use of mental health services and reducing depression and anxiety scores among individuals at high risk of common mental disorders.

methodsA before-after study was conducted from 2014 to 2019 in 12 villages in Andhra Pradesh, India. The intervention comprised a community antistigma campaign, with the training of lay village health workers and primary care doctors to identify and manage individuals with stress, depression, and suicide risk using an electronic clinical decision support system.

resultsIn total, 900 of 22,046 (4.08%) adults screened by health workers had increased stress, depression, or suicide risk and were referred to a primary care doctor. At follow-up, 731 out of 900 (81.2%) reported visiting the doctor for their mental health symptoms, compared with 3.3% (30/900) at baseline (odds ratio 133.3, 95% CI 89.0 to 199.7; P<.001). Mean depression and anxiety scores were significantly lower postintervention compared with baseline from 13.4 to 3.1 (P<.001) and from 12.9 to 1.9 (P<.001), respectively.

conclusionsThe intervention was associated with a marked increase in service uptake and clinically important reductions in depression and anxiety symptom scores. This will be further evaluated in a large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMental HealthMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicReferral and ConsultationRural PopulationYoung AdultIndiamental disordersmental health servicesmHealthprimary health carerural

Identifiers

PMID32130125
PMCPMC7068463
OpenAlexW2995322366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.