Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130115›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Tracking Knowledge Evolution in Cloud Health Care Research: Knowledge Map and Common Word Analysis.

Dongxiao Gu, Xuejie Yang, Shuyuan Deng, Changyong Liang, Xiaoyu Wang, Jiao Wu, Jingjing Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Bibliometric Analysis of Health Technology Research: 1990~2020.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Knowledge Graph Analysis of Human Health Research Related to Climate Change.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dongxiao GuThe School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3557-009X
Xuejie YangThe School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8258-7030
Shuyuan DengThe Seidman College of Business, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6034-7434
Changyong LiangThe School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2076-5345
Xiaoyu WangThe 1st Affiliated Hospital, Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6023-6037
Jiao WuCollege of Business Administration, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7868-5239
Jingjing GuoThe School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9163-5823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the continuous development of the internet and the explosive growth in data, big data technology has emerged. With its ongoing development and application, cloud computing technology provides better data storage and analysis. The development of cloud health care provides a more convenient and effective solution for health. Studying the evolution of knowledge and research hotspots in the field of cloud health care is increasingly important for medical informatics. Scholars in the medical informatics community need to understand the extent of the evolution of and possible trends in cloud health care research to inform their future research.

objectiveDrawing on the cloud health care literature, this study aimed to describe the development and evolution of research themes in cloud health care through a knowledge map and common word analysis.

methodsA total of 2878 articles about cloud health care was retrieved from the Web of Science database. We used cybermetrics to analyze and visualize the keywords in these articles. We created a knowledge map to show the evolution of cloud health care research. We used co-word analysis to identify the hotspots and their evolution in cloud health care research.

resultsThe evolution and development of cloud health care services are described. In 2007-2009 (Phase I), most scholars used cloud computing in the medical field mainly to reduce costs, and grid computing and cloud computing were the primary technologies. In 2010-2012 (Phase II), the security of cloud systems became of interest to scholars. In 2013-2015 (Phase III), medical informatization enabled big data for health services. In 2016-2017 (Phase IV), machine learning and mobile technologies were introduced to the medical field.

conclusionsCloud health care research has been rapidly developing worldwide, and technologies used in cloud health research are simultaneously diverging and becoming smarter. Cloud-based mobile health, cloud-based smart health, and the security of cloud health data and systems are three possible trends in the future development of the cloud health care field.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBiomedical ResearchCloud ComputingHumansWord Processingcloud computingcloud health careco-word analysiscybermetricshealth care informatics

Identifiers

PMID32130115
PMCPMC7064966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.