Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32129902›Full record

ArticleCancer2020

Global trends in intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma incidence from 1993 to 2012.

Andrea A Florio, Jacques Ferlay, Ariana Znaor, David Ruggieri, Christian S Alvarez, Mathieu Laversanne, Freddie Bray, Katherine A McGlynn, Jessica L Petrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 176 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
176citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

176 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrea A FlorioDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-5114-7083
Jacques FerlayCancer Surveillance Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4927-6932
Ariana ZnaorCancer Surveillance Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5849-4782
David RuggieriInformation Management Services, Inc, Rockville, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-2777-616X
Christian S AlvarezDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-5338-0444
Mathieu LaversanneCancer Surveillance Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1568-7218
Freddie BrayCancer Surveillance Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3248-7787
Katherine A McGlynnDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-2329-9933
Jessica L PetrickDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-6580-450X

Funding

Studies of Rare CancersZIACP010158 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI MCGLYNN, KATHERINE · 2009 to 2025
$19.1M
Studies of Rare CancersZ01CP010158 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI BRINTON, LOUISE · 2001 to 2008
$2.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CP010158World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICCs) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ECCs) are highly lethal bile duct tumors. Their incidence can be difficult to estimate because of changes in cancer coding over time. No studies to date have examined their global incidence and trends with high-quality topography- and histology-specific cancer registry data. Therefore, this study examined ICC and ECC incidence with the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents Plus database.

methodsRegional and national cancer registry data were used to estimate age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) per 100,000 person-years, 95% confidence intervals, and average annual percent changes (AAPCs) for ICC in 38 countries and for ECC in 33 countries from 1993 to 2012. ICC and ECC trends were tabulated and plotted by country. Rates versus birth cohort by age were plotted, and an age-period-cohort analysis was performed to assess age and cohort incidence rate ratios.

resultsThe highest rates of ICC and ECC were in Asia, specifically South Korea (ASR for ICC, 2.80; ASR for ECC, 2.24), Thailand (ASR for ICC, 2.19; ASR for ECC, 0.71), and Japan (ASR for ICC, 0.95; ASR for ECC, 0.83). Between 1993 and 2012, incidence rates of both ICC and ECC increased in most countries. The largest ASR increases over the study period occurred in Latvia (AAPC, 20.1%) and China (AAPC, 11.1%) for ICC and in Thailand (AAPC, 8.8%) and Colombia (AAPC, 8.5%) for ECC.

conclusionsIn the 20 years examined, ICC and ECC incidence increased in the majority of countries worldwide. ICC and ECC incidence may continue to increase because of metabolic and infectious etiologic factors. Efforts to further elucidate risk factors contributing to these increases in incidence are warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedTime Factorscancer registrycholangiocarcinomaepidemiologytrends

Identifiers

PMID32129902
PMCPMC7323858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.