Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32129893›Full record

ArticleCancer2020

Histopathology-validated machine learning radiographic biomarker for noninvasive discrimination between true progression and pseudo-progression in glioblastoma.

Hamed Akbari, Saima Rathore, Spyridon Bakas, MacLean P Nasrallah, Gaurav Shukla, Elizabeth Mamourian, Martin Rozycki, Stephen J Bagley, Jeffrey D Rudie, Adam E Flanders and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Artificial intelligence for response prediction and personalisation in radiation oncology.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Hamed AkbariCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-9786-3707
Saima RathoreCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Spyridon BakasCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
MacLean P NasrallahDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Gaurav ShuklaCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Elizabeth MamourianCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Martin RozyckiCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Stephen J BagleyDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-7117-0539
Jeffrey D RudieDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Adam E FlandersDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Adam P DickerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Arati S DesaiDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Donald M O'RourkeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Steven BremDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Robert LustigDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Suyash MohanDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ronald L WolfDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Michel BilelloCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Maria Martinez-LageDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christos DavatzikosCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Statistical atlases of brain tumor MRI:do imaging phenotypes predict progression?R01NS042645 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2002 to 2024
$8.7M
RESEARCH TRACK RADIOLOGY RESIDENCYT32EB004311 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Terence P Gade, Misun Hwang · 2005 to 2026
$4.5M
Cancer imaging phenomics software suite: application to brain and breast cancerU24CA189523 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS, KONTOS, DESPINA · 2015 to 2019
$3.2M
Biomedical Image Computing and Informatics ClusterS10OD023495 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2017 to 2017
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA189523NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB004311NIH HHS S10 OD023495NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS042645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImaging of glioblastoma patients after maximal safe resection and chemoradiation commonly demonstrates new enhancements that raise concerns about tumor progression. However, in 30% to 50% of patients, these enhancements primarily represent the effects of treatment, or pseudo-progression (PsP). We hypothesize that quantitative machine learning analysis of clinically acquired multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) can identify subvisual imaging characteristics to provide robust, noninvasive imaging signatures that can distinguish true progression (TP) from PsP.

methodsWe evaluated independent discovery (n = 40) and replication (n = 23) cohorts of glioblastoma patients who underwent second resection due to progressive radiographic changes suspicious for recurrence. Deep learning and conventional feature extraction methods were used to extract quantitative characteristics from the mpMRI scans. Multivariate analysis of these features revealed radiophenotypic signatures distinguishing among TP, PsP, and mixed response that compared with similar categories blindly defined by board-certified neuropathologists. Additionally, interinstitutional validation was performed on 20 new patients.

resultsPatients who demonstrate TP on neuropathology are significantly different (P < .0001) from those with PsP, showing imaging features reflecting higher angiogenesis, higher cellularity, and lower water concentration. The accuracy of the proposed signature in leave-one-out cross-validation was 87% for predicting PsP (area under the curve [AUC], 0.92) and 84% for predicting TP (AUC, 0.83), whereas in the discovery/replication cohort, the accuracy was 87% for predicting PsP (AUC, 0.84) and 78% for TP (AUC, 0.80). The accuracy in the interinstitutional cohort was 75% (AUC, 0.80).

conclusionQuantitative mpMRI analysis via machine learning reveals distinctive noninvasive signatures of TP versus PsP after treatment of glioblastoma. Integration of the proposed method into clinical studies can be performed using the freely available Cancer Imaging Phenomics Toolkit.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, Tumorglioblastomamachine learningpseudo-progressionradiographic biomarkertrue progression

Identifiers

PMID32129893
PMCPMC7893811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.