ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020
Supervised learning is an accurate method for network-based gene classification.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- A module-based approach for post-omics, post-GWAS network-based gene classification.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Identifying Choroidal Neovascularization-Associated Genes with GenePlexus in a Protein-Protein Interaction Network.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Computational strategies for cross-species knowledge transfer.Nature methods · 2026Review
- Unlocking the African bioeconomy and strengthening biodiversity conservation through genomics and bioinformatics.npj biodiversity · 2025Review
- Identifying pathological myopia associated genes with GenePlexus in protein-protein interaction network.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Computational strategies for cross-species knowledge transfer and translational biomedicine.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Joint representation of molecular networks from multiple species improves gene classification.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Optimizer's dilemma: optimization strongly influences model selection in transcriptomic prediction.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Novel Biomarkers of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Neonates Undergoing Congenital Heart Disease Surgery: A Pilot Cohort Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- The Escherichia coli Fur pan-regulon has few conserved but many unique regulatory targets.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Disclosure control of machine learning models from trusted research environments (TRE): New challenges and opportunities.Heliyon · 2023Review
- PyGenePlexus: a Python package for gene discovery using network-based machine learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- HetIG-PreDiG: A Heterogeneous Integrated Graph Model for Predicting Human Disease Genes based on gene expression.PloS one · 2023Article
- Accurately modeling biased random walks on weighted networks using node2vec.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Computational systems biology in disease modeling and control, review and perspectives.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2022Review
- Integrating multimodal data through interpretable heterogeneous ensembles.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2022Article
- Bringing machine learning to research on intellectual and developmental disabilities: taking inspiration from neurological diseases.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2022Review
- Integrating multimodal data through interpretable heterogeneous ensembles.Bioinformatics advances · 2022Article
- A network-based approach for isolating the chronic inflammation gene signatures underlying complex diseases towards finding new treatment opportunities.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Using Network-Based Machine Learning to Predict Transcription Factors Involved in Drought Resistance.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAssigning every human gene to specific functions, diseases and traits is a grand challenge in modern genetics. Key to addressing this challenge are computational methods, such as supervised learning and label propagation, that can leverage molecular interaction networks to predict gene attributes. In spite of being a popular machine-learning technique across fields, supervised learning has been applied only in a few network-based studies for predicting pathway-, phenotype- or disease-associated genes. It is unknown how supervised learning broadly performs across different networks and diverse gene classification tasks, and how it compares to label propagation, the widely benchmarked canonical approach for this problem.
resultsIn this study, we present a comprehensive benchmarking of supervised learning for network-based gene classification, evaluating this approach and a classic label propagation technique on hundreds of diverse prediction tasks and multiple networks using stringent evaluation schemes. We demonstrate that supervised learning on a gene's full network connectivity outperforms label propagaton and achieves high prediction accuracy by efficiently capturing local network properties, rivaling label propagation's appeal for naturally using network topology. We further show that supervised learning on the full network is also superior to learning on node embeddings (derived using node2vec), an increasingly popular approach for concisely representing network connectivity. These results show that supervised learning is an accurate approach for prioritizing genes associated with diverse functions, diseases and traits and should be considered a staple of network-based gene classification workflows. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The datasets and the code used to reproduce the results and add new gene classification methods have been made freely available. CONTACT: arjun@msu.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.