Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32129793›Full record

ArticleJAMA dermatology2020

Evaluation of Association Between Oral and Topical Terbinafine Use in Pregnancy and Risk of Major Malformations and Spontaneous Abortion.

Niklas Worm Andersson, Simon Francis Thomsen, Jon Trærup Andersen

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Onychomycosis in special populations.Future microbiology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Common Antifungal Drugs in Pregnancy: Risks and Precautions.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Niklas Worm AnderssonDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen NV, Denmark.
Simon Francis ThomsenDepartment of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jon Trærup AndersenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen NV, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKFrederiksberg Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Terbinafine is a commonly used antifungal agent, but safety data of its use in pregnancy are limited. Objective: To examine the association between oral and topical terbinafine exposure in pregnancy and the risk of major malformations and spontaneous abortion. Design, Setting, and Participants: A nationwide, registry-based cohort study was conducted in Denmark from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2016, in a cohort of 1 650 649 pregnancies. Data analysis was performed from July 11 to October 20, 2019. Pregnancies were matched on propensity scores comparing oral terbinafine exposed vs unexposed (1:10 ratio), topical terbinafine exposed vs unexposed (1:10), and oral vs topical terbinafine exposed (1:1). Exposures: Filled prescriptions for oral or topical terbinafine. Main Outcomes and Measures: Logistic regression was used to compute prevalence odds ratios for the primary outcome of major malformations and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compute hazard ratios for the secondary outcome of spontaneous abortion. Results: Based on a cohort of 1 650 649 pregnancies, oral terbinafine-exposed (n = 891 pregnancies; mean [SD] age, 30.4 [6] years) and topical terbinafine-exposed (n = 3174; mean [SD] age, 29.5 [5.4] years) pregnancies were identified; up to a total of 40 650 unexposed pregnancies were included for the matched outcome analyses. In propensity-matched comparisons of the risk of major malformations, the prevalence odds ratios were 1.01 (95% CI, 0.63-1.62) for oral terbinafine-exposed vs unexposed pregnancies (absolute risk difference [ARD], 0.04%; 95% CI, -1.69% to 1.76%), 1.08 (95% CI, 0.81-1.44) for topical terbinafine-exposed vs unexposed pregnancies (ARD, 0.26%; 95% CI, -0.73% to 1.26%), and 1.18 (95% CI, 0.61-2.29) for oral vs topical terbinafine-exposed pregnancies (ARD, 0.59%; 95% CI, -1.71% to 2.88%). For the risk of spontaneous abortion, the hazard ratios were 1.06 (95% CI, 0.86-1.32) for oral terbinafine-exposed vs unexposed pregnancies (ARD, 0.13%; 95% CI, -1.97% to 2.24%), 1.04 (95% CI, 0.88-1.21) for topical terbinafine-exposed vs unexposed pregnancies (ARD, 0.17%; 95% CI, -0.64% to 0.98%), and 1.19 (95% CI, 0.84-1.70) for oral vs topical terbinafine-exposed (ARD, 1.13%; 95% CI, -2.23% to 4.50%) pregnancies. Conclusions and Relevance: Among pregnancies exposed to oral or topical terbinafine, no increased risk of major malformations or spontaneous abortion was identified.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, Drug-InducedAbortion, SpontaneousAdministration, OralAdministration, TopicalAdultAntifungal AgentsCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRegistriesTerbinafineYoung AdultAntifungal AgentsTerbinafine

Identifiers

PMID32129793
PMCPMC7057179
OpenAlexW3010276363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.