ArticleJAMA dermatology2020
Evaluation of Association Between Oral and Topical Terbinafine Use in Pregnancy and Risk of Major Malformations and Spontaneous Abortion.
Article in JAMA dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Onychomycosis in special populations.Future microbiology · 2025Review
- Sporotrichosis during pregnancy: A retrospective study of 58 cases in a reference center from 1998 to 2023.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Article
- Antifungal medication use during pregnancy and the risk of selected major birth defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2024Article
- Allylamines, Benzylamines, and Fungal Cell Permeability: A Review of Mechanistic Effects and Usefulness against Fungal Pathogens.Membranes · 2022Review
- Common Antifungal Drugs in Pregnancy: Risks and Precautions.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2021Review
- Nail Society of India Recommendations for Treatment of Onychomycosis in Special Population Groups.Indian dermatology online journalReview
- The unprecedented epidemic-like scenario of dermatophytosis in India: III. Antifungal resistance and treatment options.Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Terbinafine is a commonly used antifungal agent, but safety data of its use in pregnancy are limited. Objective: To examine the association between oral and topical terbinafine exposure in pregnancy and the risk of major malformations and spontaneous abortion. Design, Setting, and Participants: A nationwide, registry-based cohort study was conducted in Denmark from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2016, in a cohort of 1 650 649 pregnancies. Data analysis was performed from July 11 to October 20, 2019. Pregnancies were matched on propensity scores comparing oral terbinafine exposed vs unexposed (1:10 ratio), topical terbinafine exposed vs unexposed (1:10), and oral vs topical terbinafine exposed (1:1). Exposures: Filled prescriptions for oral or topical terbinafine. Main Outcomes and Measures: Logistic regression was used to compute prevalence odds ratios for the primary outcome of major malformations and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compute hazard ratios for the secondary outcome of spontaneous abortion. Results: Based on a cohort of 1 650 649 pregnancies, oral terbinafine-exposed (n = 891 pregnancies; mean [SD] age, 30.4 [6] years) and topical terbinafine-exposed (n = 3174; mean [SD] age, 29.5 [5.4] years) pregnancies were identified; up to a total of 40 650 unexposed pregnancies were included for the matched outcome analyses. In propensity-matched comparisons of the risk of major malformations, the prevalence odds ratios were 1.01 (95% CI, 0.63-1.62) for oral terbinafine-exposed vs unexposed pregnancies (absolute risk difference [ARD], 0.04%; 95% CI, -1.69% to 1.76%), 1.08 (95% CI, 0.81-1.44) for topical terbinafine-exposed vs unexposed pregnancies (ARD, 0.26%; 95% CI, -0.73% to 1.26%), and 1.18 (95% CI, 0.61-2.29) for oral vs topical terbinafine-exposed pregnancies (ARD, 0.59%; 95% CI, -1.71% to 2.88%). For the risk of spontaneous abortion, the hazard ratios were 1.06 (95% CI, 0.86-1.32) for oral terbinafine-exposed vs unexposed pregnancies (ARD, 0.13%; 95% CI, -1.97% to 2.24%), 1.04 (95% CI, 0.88-1.21) for topical terbinafine-exposed vs unexposed pregnancies (ARD, 0.17%; 95% CI, -0.64% to 0.98%), and 1.19 (95% CI, 0.84-1.70) for oral vs topical terbinafine-exposed (ARD, 1.13%; 95% CI, -2.23% to 4.50%) pregnancies. Conclusions and Relevance: Among pregnancies exposed to oral or topical terbinafine, no increased risk of major malformations or spontaneous abortion was identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.