Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32129638›Full record

ArticleThe Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research2020

Investigating selective media for optimal isolation of Brucella spp. in South Africa.

Maphuti B Ledwaba, Okechukwu C Ndumnego, Itumeleng Matle, Awoke K Gelaw, Henriette Van Heerden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Polyphasic Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  3. Seroprevalence, and molecular detection ofInfection ecology & epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecular characterization ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Whole Genome Sequence Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  10. Bovine brucellosis - a comprehensive review.The veterinary quarterly · 2021
    Review
  11. Investigation ofMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maphuti B LedwabaDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria. ledwababetty@gmail.com.
Okechukwu C Ndumnego
Itumeleng Matle
Awoke K Gelaw
Henriette Van Heerden

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine brucellosis in South Africa is caused mainly by Brucella abortus biovar (bv.) 1 and less frequently by B. abortus bv. 2. Bacterial isolation is regarded as the gold standard for diagnosis of Brucella species; however, it is not very sensitive. The aim of this study was to determine the selective medium with optimum antibiotic composition that will allow the growth of Brucella species (spp.) while inhibiting moulds, yeast and most, if not all, Gram-negative contaminants in South Africa. In the controlled experiment, modified Agrifood Research and Technology Center of Aragon (CITA) medium (mCITA) seemed to be the optimum selective medium for isolation of Brucella spp. as compared with Farrell's medium (FM) and modified Thayer Martin (mTM), while FM inhibited the growth of most fungal and bacterial contaminants. Mean comparison between the three media used to culture B. abortus resulted in lower mean difference ranging from 0 to 2.33. In case of Brucella ovis, high mean difference was obtained when comparing FM with mCITA (10.33) and mTM (12). However, the mean differences of 0.67 and 1.67 were obtained when comparing mCITA and mTM media used to, respectively, culture pasteurised and raw milk spiked with B. ovis. Further optimisation at the Agricultural Research Council - Onderstepoort Veterinary Research Institute resulted in a comparable performance between FM and mCITA; however, mCITA allowed optimal growth of the fastidious B. ovis, which is generally inhibited on FM. Generally, mCITA seemed to be the optimum selective medium for isolation of Brucella spp., while FM inhibits the growth of most fungal and bacterial contaminants. Thus, veterinary laboratories can use mCITA and/or FM but should take into consideration the detection of factious Brucella isolated in the country or region.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBrucellaBrucellosisCulture MediaFungiSouth AfricaYeastsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCulture MediaBacterial isolationBovine brucellosisselective media

Identifiers

PMID32129638
PMCPMC7136694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.